Testing usability in Moodle: When and How to do it

Andrei Ternauciuc, R. Vasiu
{"title":"Testing usability in Moodle: When and How to do it","authors":"Andrei Ternauciuc, R. Vasiu","doi":"10.1109/SISY.2015.7325391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing the usability of a Moodle-based learning platform has been done many times before. Countless case-studies have identified weak points in the ever popular open-source system and sometimes, found solutions. Comparisons were made with other popular learning management systems (LMS), either commercial or free and open-source, with mixed results. These comparisons were usually employed as the tools for choosing one LMS over another, in the preliminary phase of adopting or developing a new e-learning platform. However, if the platform already exists, and has been functioning for a decent number of years, is it still necessary to test its usability? Considering that Moodle is currently on a bi-annual cycle for official releases and the online world is a very dynamic environment in need of constant adapting, the answer seems to be affirmative. Then, what are the main ways in which to test the usability of a learning platform (Moodle in particular), with its own characteristics which sets it apart from the general considerations of a web platform? Which of these methods are best suited for the different types of analyses we call “usability”? These are some of the questions that this paper tries to answer by analyzing the needs for usability testing and subsequently proposing a testing strategy for the “Campus Virtual” e-learning platform, the official online tool for managing the learning process in the Politehnica University Timisoara.","PeriodicalId":144551,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SISY.2015.7325391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Testing the usability of a Moodle-based learning platform has been done many times before. Countless case-studies have identified weak points in the ever popular open-source system and sometimes, found solutions. Comparisons were made with other popular learning management systems (LMS), either commercial or free and open-source, with mixed results. These comparisons were usually employed as the tools for choosing one LMS over another, in the preliminary phase of adopting or developing a new e-learning platform. However, if the platform already exists, and has been functioning for a decent number of years, is it still necessary to test its usability? Considering that Moodle is currently on a bi-annual cycle for official releases and the online world is a very dynamic environment in need of constant adapting, the answer seems to be affirmative. Then, what are the main ways in which to test the usability of a learning platform (Moodle in particular), with its own characteristics which sets it apart from the general considerations of a web platform? Which of these methods are best suited for the different types of analyses we call “usability”? These are some of the questions that this paper tries to answer by analyzing the needs for usability testing and subsequently proposing a testing strategy for the “Campus Virtual” e-learning platform, the official online tool for managing the learning process in the Politehnica University Timisoara.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Moodle中测试可用性:何时以及如何做
测试基于moodle的学习平台的可用性之前已经做过很多次了。无数的案例研究已经发现了流行的开源系统的弱点,有时还找到了解决方案。与其他流行的学习管理系统(LMS)进行比较,无论是商业的还是免费和开源的,结果好坏参半。在采用或开发新的电子学习平台的初步阶段,这些比较通常被用作选择LMS的工具。然而,如果这个平台已经存在,并且已经运行了相当长的时间,那么还有必要测试它的可用性吗?考虑到Moodle目前的官方发布周期是两年一次,而在线世界是一个非常动态的环境,需要不断适应,答案似乎是肯定的。那么,测试一个学习平台(特别是Moodle)的可用性的主要方法是什么?它有自己的特点,使它有别于一般的web平台?这些方法中哪一种最适合于我们称之为“可用性”的不同类型的分析?这些是本文试图通过分析可用性测试的需求来回答的一些问题,并随后提出了“校园虚拟”电子学习平台的测试策略,该平台是蒂米什瓦拉Politehnica大学管理学习过程的官方在线工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Your constant companion — Engineering students and their mobile phones Weak convergence of sequences of distorted probabilities Composition and calibration of a custom made omnidirectional camera Calibration system for tactile measuring probes From exoskeleton to the Antal Bejczy center for intelligent robotics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1