The Professionalization of Academic Advising: A Structured Literature Review

Craig M. McGill
{"title":"The Professionalization of Academic Advising: A Structured Literature Review","authors":"Craig M. McGill","doi":"10.12930/NACADA-18-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practitioners and scholars of academic advising have long grappled with the professional status of the field. To better understand the characteristics of professionalization and the obstacles that stand in the way of professionalizing the field, a structured review of the literature from 1980 to 2016 was conducted. Three characteristics of professionalization were discussed in the advising literature: issues with scholarship, expansion of graduate programs, and community. Obstacles to professionalization discovered through the review were the need to define the field further, role of the professional association, training and education required to perform the advising role, personal and occupational autonomy, and lack of a consistent administrative home for advising. Suggestions for future research are offered.","PeriodicalId":158925,"journal":{"name":"NACADA Journal","volume":"03 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACADA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-18-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Practitioners and scholars of academic advising have long grappled with the professional status of the field. To better understand the characteristics of professionalization and the obstacles that stand in the way of professionalizing the field, a structured review of the literature from 1980 to 2016 was conducted. Three characteristics of professionalization were discussed in the advising literature: issues with scholarship, expansion of graduate programs, and community. Obstacles to professionalization discovered through the review were the need to define the field further, role of the professional association, training and education required to perform the advising role, personal and occupational autonomy, and lack of a consistent administrative home for advising. Suggestions for future research are offered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术指导的专业化:一个结构化的文献综述
长期以来,学术咨询的从业者和学者一直在努力解决该领域的专业地位问题。为了更好地理解专业化的特征和阻碍该领域专业化的障碍,我们对1980年至2016年的文献进行了结构化的回顾。在咨询文献中讨论了专业化的三个特征:奖学金问题、研究生项目的扩展和社区。通过审查发现的专业化障碍有:需要进一步界定领域、专业协会的作用、发挥咨询作用所需的培训和教育、个人和职业自主、缺乏一贯的咨询行政机构。并对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tensions: A Grounded Theory of Ethical Practice Understanding the Career Management of Female Primary-Role Advisors Messaging Matters: The Impact of Advising Micromessages on Student Affect and Behavior across Diverse University Campuses Attitudes about Cybersecurity Articulation Agreements and Transfer Students: A Statewide Survey of Faculty Members and Advisors Online Graduate Career Changers: Motivations and Use of Academic and Career Advising Services and Resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1