Near-optimal FIPP p-cycle network designs using general path-protecting p-cycles and combined GA-ILP methods

Diane Prisca Onguetou, D. Baloukov, W. Grover
{"title":"Near-optimal FIPP p-cycle network designs using general path-protecting p-cycles and combined GA-ILP methods","authors":"Diane Prisca Onguetou, D. Baloukov, W. Grover","doi":"10.1109/DRCN.2009.5339999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work on failure independent path-protecting p-cycles (FIPP) has revealed some new, relatively simple and possibly cost-effective approaches for FIPP p-cycle network design. The first step of the proposed strategy consists of solving a more general path-protecting p-cycle (GPP) problem in which the constraint of failure independence is relaxed. The second step consists of imposing the failure independence constraint onto the GPP solution and identifying the working paths that become unprotected as a result. A FIPP p-cycle solution is extracted by capacitating additional cycles to protect these paths, the number of which the results revealed to never exceed three. Another contribution of this work is the adaptation of the novel combination of genetic algorithms with integer linear programming (GA-ILP) to the GPP concept, which allowed us to solve large GPP problem instances. GA-ILP solutions were typically within 1% of optimality for smaller networks for which the exact solutions were known. The GPP and FIPP solutions obtained with the assistance of GA-ILP were considerably better (by as much as 23%) than those obtained by the FIPP disjoint route set (DRS) method. Furthermore, the results obtained in this paper also showed that relaxing the disjoint route set constraint in FIPP p-cycle networks can result in as much as 9% decrease in spare capacity cost. Also in this paper, we ventured to provide a true comparison of span-protecting p-cycles with FIPP p-cycles, from the capacity efficiency perspective.","PeriodicalId":227820,"journal":{"name":"2009 7th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 7th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRCN.2009.5339999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Recent work on failure independent path-protecting p-cycles (FIPP) has revealed some new, relatively simple and possibly cost-effective approaches for FIPP p-cycle network design. The first step of the proposed strategy consists of solving a more general path-protecting p-cycle (GPP) problem in which the constraint of failure independence is relaxed. The second step consists of imposing the failure independence constraint onto the GPP solution and identifying the working paths that become unprotected as a result. A FIPP p-cycle solution is extracted by capacitating additional cycles to protect these paths, the number of which the results revealed to never exceed three. Another contribution of this work is the adaptation of the novel combination of genetic algorithms with integer linear programming (GA-ILP) to the GPP concept, which allowed us to solve large GPP problem instances. GA-ILP solutions were typically within 1% of optimality for smaller networks for which the exact solutions were known. The GPP and FIPP solutions obtained with the assistance of GA-ILP were considerably better (by as much as 23%) than those obtained by the FIPP disjoint route set (DRS) method. Furthermore, the results obtained in this paper also showed that relaxing the disjoint route set constraint in FIPP p-cycle networks can result in as much as 9% decrease in spare capacity cost. Also in this paper, we ventured to provide a true comparison of span-protecting p-cycles with FIPP p-cycles, from the capacity efficiency perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用一般路径保护p环和GA-ILP联合方法的近最优FIPP p环网络设计
最近对故障无关路径保护p环(FIPP)的研究揭示了一些新的、相对简单的、可能具有成本效益的FIPP p环网络设计方法。该策略的第一步包括解决更一般的路径保护p-环(GPP)问题,其中失效独立性约束放宽。第二步包括将故障独立性约束强加到GPP解决方案上,并确定因此而变得不受保护的工作路径。一个FIPP p循环的解决方案是通过额外的电容循环来保护这些路径,其结果显示,其数量永远不会超过三个。这项工作的另一个贡献是将遗传算法与整数线性规划(GA-ILP)的新组合适应于GPP概念,这使我们能够解决大型GPP问题实例。对于已知精确解的较小网络,GA-ILP解决方案通常在最优性的1%以内。GA-ILP辅助下获得的GPP和FIPP解决方案比FIPP不连接路由集(DRS)方法获得的解决方案要好得多(高达23%)。此外,本文的研究结果还表明,放宽FIPP p-cycle网络中的不相交路由集约束可使备用容量成本降低9%。此外,在本文中,我们大胆地从容量效率的角度提供了跨保护p循环与FIPP p循环的真正比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the topological resilience of mobile ad hoc networks Robust routing vs dynamic load-balancing a comprehensive study and new directions Survivability of P2P multicasting Performance of a cognitive radio network with tolerable service degradation Providing survivability against jamming attack via joint dynamic routing and channel assignment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1