Social Phobia, Traumatic Experiences and Other Psychosocial Factors Accompanying Vaginismus

I. Yagci, Ali Inaltekin
{"title":"Social Phobia, Traumatic Experiences and Other Psychosocial Factors Accompanying Vaginismus","authors":"I. Yagci, Ali Inaltekin","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2023120203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Vaginismus is the most common reason for women to apply to psychiatry outpatient clinics due to sexual problems. It has been suggested that many psychological, social, and cultural factors may cause vaginismus; however, it has not been fully clarified. In this study, factors that may be associated with vaginismus were evaluated and compared with controls.\n\nMethods: The case group was constituted of 28 females diagnosed with primary vaginismus, and the control group was constituted of 27 healthy individuals with no difficulty in vaginal penetration. All individuals participating in the study were evaluated with self-reported scales in terms of state-trait anxiety, social phobia, self-regard, childhood trauma, and sexual function. In addition, sociodemographic variables were collected for each participant.\n\nResults: While the mean age was 25.04±2.62 in the vaginismus group, it was 26.48±2.83 in the control group. Compared to the control group, women with vaginismus were found to have significantly higher scores for age difference with their parents, state-trait anxiety, emotional neglect, physical neglect, emotional abuse, a total of childhood trauma scale, communication, satisfaction, touching, frequency, vaginismus, anorgasmia, and lower scores for self-esteem. In addition, a positive correlation was found between maternal education level, state and trait anxiety, childhood trauma, social phobia, self-esteem scale score and vaginismus.\n\nConclusion: It was considered that to evaluate vaginismus only as an entry difficulty would be deficient and that there may be comorbid or related conditions such as social phobia, anxiety, trauma, low self-esteem, and a holistic evaluation is necessary.\n\nKeywords: psychological trauma, psychosocial factors, social phobia, vaginismus","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2023120203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Vaginismus is the most common reason for women to apply to psychiatry outpatient clinics due to sexual problems. It has been suggested that many psychological, social, and cultural factors may cause vaginismus; however, it has not been fully clarified. In this study, factors that may be associated with vaginismus were evaluated and compared with controls. Methods: The case group was constituted of 28 females diagnosed with primary vaginismus, and the control group was constituted of 27 healthy individuals with no difficulty in vaginal penetration. All individuals participating in the study were evaluated with self-reported scales in terms of state-trait anxiety, social phobia, self-regard, childhood trauma, and sexual function. In addition, sociodemographic variables were collected for each participant. Results: While the mean age was 25.04±2.62 in the vaginismus group, it was 26.48±2.83 in the control group. Compared to the control group, women with vaginismus were found to have significantly higher scores for age difference with their parents, state-trait anxiety, emotional neglect, physical neglect, emotional abuse, a total of childhood trauma scale, communication, satisfaction, touching, frequency, vaginismus, anorgasmia, and lower scores for self-esteem. In addition, a positive correlation was found between maternal education level, state and trait anxiety, childhood trauma, social phobia, self-esteem scale score and vaginismus. Conclusion: It was considered that to evaluate vaginismus only as an entry difficulty would be deficient and that there may be comorbid or related conditions such as social phobia, anxiety, trauma, low self-esteem, and a holistic evaluation is necessary. Keywords: psychological trauma, psychosocial factors, social phobia, vaginismus
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴随阴道痉挛的社交恐惧症、创伤经历及其他社会心理因素
目的:阴道痉挛是女性因性问题到精神科门诊就诊的最常见原因。人们认为许多心理、社会和文化因素可能导致阴道痉挛;然而,它还没有完全澄清。在这项研究中,评估了可能与阴道痉挛相关的因素,并与对照组进行了比较。方法:病例组28例确诊为原发性阴道痉挛的女性,对照组27例阴道插入无困难的健康个体。所有参与研究的个体都用自我报告的量表对状态-特质焦虑、社交恐惧症、自尊、童年创伤和性功能进行了评估。此外,还收集了每个参与者的社会人口学变量。结果:阴道痉挛组平均年龄为25.04±2.62岁,对照组平均年龄为26.48±2.83岁。与对照组相比,阴道痉挛女性在与父母年龄差异、状态-特质焦虑、情绪忽视、身体忽视、情绪虐待、童年创伤量表、沟通、满意度、触摸、频率、阴道痉挛、性高潮等方面得分显著高于对照组,自尊得分较低。此外,母亲受教育程度、状态与特质焦虑、童年创伤、社交恐惧症、自尊量表得分与阴道痉挛呈显著正相关。结论:单纯将阴道痉挛作为一种进入困难进行评估是有缺陷的,可能存在社交恐惧症、焦虑、创伤、自卑等共病或相关情况,有必要进行整体评估。关键词:心理创伤,社会心理因素,社交恐惧症,阴道痉挛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Three Methods, “Pap Smear, Conization and LEEP” in Women with Abnormal Pap Smear: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analytical Study Evaluation of Misbeliefs, Myths and Knowledge About Nevi and Skin Cancer in Dermatology Patients Breastfeeding Problems of Mothers in the Postpartum Period and Impact on Sleep Quality The Relationship of Pain Sensitivity and Severity with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain The Relationship Between Parents’ Health Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1