Resisting or embracing institutional models of parenthood: an analytical framework

Daniela Grunow
{"title":"Resisting or embracing institutional models of parenthood: an analytical framework","authors":"Daniela Grunow","doi":"10.4337/9781788972970.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision to have a child has never appeared more individualized and conscious than today, in early twenty-first century Europe. While fewer couples opt for parenthood altogether, those who do often plan the transition carefully, deliberating early-on when to start a family and how to raise their child (Balbo et al. 2013; Grunow and Evertsson 2016; Klijzing 2000). On the one hand, this trend reflects greater individual agency and gender equity among couples as pregnancy has become calculable and both sexes enter parenthood on more equal terms, usually with similar levels of educational attainment and employment experience. On the other hand, the need to carefully plan the first care-intensive years of parenthood appears more eminent today than ever before. First, the question how new mothers and fathers should adapt to their shifting obligations for childcare and work is less clear as both partners have more similar market and non-market skills than their parents’ generation. In addition, more equitable care arrangements between mothers and fathers have become feasible, even during the early stages of parenthood, as more sophisticated devices for expressing breast milk and bottle-feeding have become available (Johns et al. 2013). Second, institutional shifts in gender culture and family policies have rendered gendered work-care adaptations less clear, as European societies in general favour men’s more active engagement in infant care (Edlund and Öun 2016). This shift is most clearly evident in the family policy realm, as more countries are making care leaves available to fathers and offer incentives for dual care. Consequently, mothers’ all-encompassing role as sole primary carers has become less entrenched. Third, employment interruptions and lower work hours to enable care by either parent put a strain on the household budget during a time when families need more rather than less financial security. Most families nowadays depend on two incomes to maintain","PeriodicalId":166269,"journal":{"name":"New Parents in Europe","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Parents in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972970.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The decision to have a child has never appeared more individualized and conscious than today, in early twenty-first century Europe. While fewer couples opt for parenthood altogether, those who do often plan the transition carefully, deliberating early-on when to start a family and how to raise their child (Balbo et al. 2013; Grunow and Evertsson 2016; Klijzing 2000). On the one hand, this trend reflects greater individual agency and gender equity among couples as pregnancy has become calculable and both sexes enter parenthood on more equal terms, usually with similar levels of educational attainment and employment experience. On the other hand, the need to carefully plan the first care-intensive years of parenthood appears more eminent today than ever before. First, the question how new mothers and fathers should adapt to their shifting obligations for childcare and work is less clear as both partners have more similar market and non-market skills than their parents’ generation. In addition, more equitable care arrangements between mothers and fathers have become feasible, even during the early stages of parenthood, as more sophisticated devices for expressing breast milk and bottle-feeding have become available (Johns et al. 2013). Second, institutional shifts in gender culture and family policies have rendered gendered work-care adaptations less clear, as European societies in general favour men’s more active engagement in infant care (Edlund and Öun 2016). This shift is most clearly evident in the family policy realm, as more countries are making care leaves available to fathers and offer incentives for dual care. Consequently, mothers’ all-encompassing role as sole primary carers has become less entrenched. Third, employment interruptions and lower work hours to enable care by either parent put a strain on the household budget during a time when families need more rather than less financial security. Most families nowadays depend on two incomes to maintain
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵制或接受父母的制度模式:一个分析框架
在二十一世纪初的欧洲,要孩子的决定从来没有像今天这样显得更加个性化和有意识。虽然很少有夫妇选择完全成为父母,但那些选择成为父母的夫妇通常会仔细计划过渡,在早期就考虑何时组建家庭以及如何抚养孩子(Balbo et al. 2013;Grunow and Evertsson 2016;Klijzing 2000)。一方面,这一趋势反映了夫妻之间更大的个人能动性和性别平等,因为怀孕已经变得可以计算,两性在更平等的条件下开始为人父母,通常具有相似的教育程度和就业经验。另一方面,在为人父母的头几年里,精心规划的必要性比以往任何时候都更加突出。首先,新妈妈和新爸爸应该如何适应他们在照顾孩子和工作方面不断变化的责任,这个问题不太清楚,因为双方都比父母那一代拥有更相似的市场和非市场技能。此外,母亲和父亲之间更公平的护理安排已经变得可行,甚至在为人父母的早期阶段,因为更复杂的挤奶和奶瓶喂养设备已经可用(Johns et al. 2013)。其次,性别文化和家庭政策的制度转变使得性别工作护理适应不太明确,因为欧洲社会普遍支持男性更积极地参与婴儿护理(Edlund and Öun 2016)。这种转变在家庭政策领域表现得最为明显,越来越多的国家为父亲提供育儿假,并为双重护理提供激励。因此,母亲作为唯一主要照顾者的包罗万象的角色变得不那么根深蒂固了。第三,在家庭需要更多而不是更少的经济保障的时候,就业中断和减少工作时间以使父母中的任何一方能够照顾孩子,给家庭预算带来了压力。现在大多数家庭依靠两份收入来维持生活
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Couples alignment of pre-birth plans and post-birth realities in Switzerland: non-normative adaptation to the one-and-a-half earner model Couples in their national context: gender ideology and maternal labour force attachment Realized plans or revised dreams? Swedish parents experiences of care, parental leave and paid work after childbirth The transition to parenthood in Italy: reasons for non-normativity Working and caring: German couples realizations of non-normative work-care plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1