Information-Theoretic Bounds for Differentially Private Mechanisms

G. Barthe, Boris Köpf
{"title":"Information-Theoretic Bounds for Differentially Private Mechanisms","authors":"G. Barthe, Boris Köpf","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2011.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two active and independent lines of research that aim at quantifying the amount of information that is disclosed by computing on confidential data. Each line of research has developed its own notion of confidentiality: on the one hand, differential privacy is the emerging consensus guarantee used for privacy-preserving data analysis. On the other hand, information-theoretic notions of leakage are used for characterizing the confidentiality properties of programs in language-based settings. The purpose of this article is to establish formal connections between both notions of confidentiality, and to compare them in terms of the security guarantees they deliver. We obtain the following results. First, we establish upper bounds for the leakage of every eps-differentially private mechanism in terms of eps and the size of the mechanism's input domain. We achieve this by identifying and leveraging a connection to coding theory. Second, we construct a class of eps-differentially private channels whose leakage grows with the size of their input domains. Using these channels, we show that there cannot be domain-size-independent bounds for the leakage of all eps-differentially private mechanisms. Moreover, we perform an empirical evaluation that shows that the leakage of these channels almost matches our theoretical upper bounds, demonstrating the accuracy of these bounds. Finally, we show that the question of providing optimal upper bounds for the leakage of eps-differentially private mechanisms in terms of rational functions of eps is in fact decidable.","PeriodicalId":364995,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 24th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 24th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2011.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

There are two active and independent lines of research that aim at quantifying the amount of information that is disclosed by computing on confidential data. Each line of research has developed its own notion of confidentiality: on the one hand, differential privacy is the emerging consensus guarantee used for privacy-preserving data analysis. On the other hand, information-theoretic notions of leakage are used for characterizing the confidentiality properties of programs in language-based settings. The purpose of this article is to establish formal connections between both notions of confidentiality, and to compare them in terms of the security guarantees they deliver. We obtain the following results. First, we establish upper bounds for the leakage of every eps-differentially private mechanism in terms of eps and the size of the mechanism's input domain. We achieve this by identifying and leveraging a connection to coding theory. Second, we construct a class of eps-differentially private channels whose leakage grows with the size of their input domains. Using these channels, we show that there cannot be domain-size-independent bounds for the leakage of all eps-differentially private mechanisms. Moreover, we perform an empirical evaluation that shows that the leakage of these channels almost matches our theoretical upper bounds, demonstrating the accuracy of these bounds. Finally, we show that the question of providing optimal upper bounds for the leakage of eps-differentially private mechanisms in terms of rational functions of eps is in fact decidable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差分私有机制的信息论界
目前有两个活跃且独立的研究方向,旨在量化通过计算机密数据而泄露的信息量。每个研究领域都发展了自己的机密性概念:一方面,差分隐私是用于保护隐私的数据分析的新兴共识保证。另一方面,泄漏的信息论概念被用于描述基于语言设置的程序的机密性。本文的目的是建立两种机密性概念之间的正式联系,并根据它们提供的安全保证对它们进行比较。我们得到以下结果。首先,我们根据eps和机制输入域的大小建立了每个eps-差分私有机制的泄漏上界。我们通过识别和利用与编码理论的联系来实现这一点。其次,我们构造了一类eps差分私有通道,其泄漏随其输入域的大小而增长。使用这些通道,我们证明了所有ep -差分私有机制的泄漏不可能存在与域大小无关的边界。此外,我们进行了经验评估,表明这些通道的泄漏几乎符合我们的理论上限,证明了这些边界的准确性。最后,我们证明了在eps的有理函数下,为eps-差分私有机制的泄漏提供最优上界的问题实际上是可决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Statistical Test for Information Leaks Using Continuous Mutual Information Local Memory via Layout Randomization Regret Minimizing Audits: A Learning-Theoretic Basis for Privacy Protection Guiding a General-Purpose C Verifier to Prove Cryptographic Protocols Integrated Specification and Verification of Security Protocols and Policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1