Geometry approach for k-regret query

Peng Peng, R. C. Wong
{"title":"Geometry approach for k-regret query","authors":"Peng Peng, R. C. Wong","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.2014.6816699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Returning tuples that users may be interested in is one of the most important goals for multi-criteria decision making. Top-k queries and skyline queries are two representative queries. A top-k query has its merit of returning a limited number of tuples to users but requires users to give their exact utility functions. A skyline query has its merit that users do not need to give their exact utility functions but has no control over the number of tuples to be returned. In this paper, we study a k-regret query, a recently proposed query, which integrates the merits of the two representative queries. We first identify some interesting geometry properties for the k-regret query. Based on these properties, we define a set of candidate points called happy points for the k-regret query, which has not been studied in the literature. This result is very fundamental and beneficial to not only all existing algorithms but also all new algorithms to be developed for the k-regret query. Since it is found that the number of happy points is very small, the efficiency of all existing algorithms can be improved significantly. Furthermore, based on other geometry properties, we propose two efficient algorithms each of which performs more efficiently than the best-known fastest algorithm. Our experimental results show that our proposed algorithms run faster than the best-known method on both synthetic and real datasets. In particular, in our experiments on real datasets, the best-known method took more than 3 hours to answer a k-regret query but one of our proposed methods took about a few minutes and the other took within a second.","PeriodicalId":159130,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2014.6816699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Returning tuples that users may be interested in is one of the most important goals for multi-criteria decision making. Top-k queries and skyline queries are two representative queries. A top-k query has its merit of returning a limited number of tuples to users but requires users to give their exact utility functions. A skyline query has its merit that users do not need to give their exact utility functions but has no control over the number of tuples to be returned. In this paper, we study a k-regret query, a recently proposed query, which integrates the merits of the two representative queries. We first identify some interesting geometry properties for the k-regret query. Based on these properties, we define a set of candidate points called happy points for the k-regret query, which has not been studied in the literature. This result is very fundamental and beneficial to not only all existing algorithms but also all new algorithms to be developed for the k-regret query. Since it is found that the number of happy points is very small, the efficiency of all existing algorithms can be improved significantly. Furthermore, based on other geometry properties, we propose two efficient algorithms each of which performs more efficiently than the best-known fastest algorithm. Our experimental results show that our proposed algorithms run faster than the best-known method on both synthetic and real datasets. In particular, in our experiments on real datasets, the best-known method took more than 3 hours to answer a k-regret query but one of our proposed methods took about a few minutes and the other took within a second.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
k-遗憾查询的几何方法
返回用户可能感兴趣的元组是多标准决策的最重要目标之一。Top-k查询和skyline查询是两个具有代表性的查询。top-k查询的优点是向用户返回有限数量的元组,但要求用户给出确切的实用函数。skyline查询有其优点,即用户不需要提供确切的实用函数,但无法控制要返回的元组的数量。在本文中,我们研究了一个最近提出的k-后悔查询,它综合了两种代表性查询的优点。我们首先为k-regret查询识别一些有趣的几何属性。基于这些属性,我们为k-后悔查询定义了一组候选点,称为快乐点,这在文献中尚未研究过。这一结果不仅对所有现有的k-遗憾查询算法,而且对所有新的k-遗憾查询算法的开发都是非常重要的。由于发现快乐点的数量非常少,所以现有的所有算法的效率都可以得到显著提高。此外,基于其他几何性质,我们提出了两种有效的算法,每一种算法都比最著名的最快算法更有效。实验结果表明,无论在合成数据集还是真实数据集上,我们提出的算法都比最知名的方法运行速度更快。特别是,在我们对真实数据集的实验中,最著名的方法花了3个多小时来回答一个k-regret查询,但我们提出的一种方法只花了几分钟,另一种方法只花了一秒钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing uncertainty in spatial and spatio-temporal data Locality-sensitive operators for parallel main-memory database clusters KnowLife: A knowledge graph for health and life sciences We can learn your #hashtags: Connecting tweets to explicit topics A demonstration of MNTG - A web-based road network traffic generator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1