Taxonomic complexity, population genetics, and plant conservation in Scotland

P. Hollingsworth
{"title":"Taxonomic complexity, population genetics, and plant conservation in Scotland","authors":"P. Hollingsworth","doi":"10.1080/03746600308685048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Groups of plants that are undergoing active diversification often do not fall into neat and tidy taxonomies. In such groups it can sometimes be very difficult to establish what does, and what does not, constitute a species. This presents problems for species-based conservation programmes that are based around prioritised species-lists (e.g. the UK Biodiversity Action Plans; BAPs), particularly as the inclusion or exclusion of taxa on these lists largely determines the allocation of conservation resources. This is an important issue as almost half of the BAP priority higher plant species for which Scotland has prime responsibility are taxonomically controversial. Recent research using population genetic approaches to tackle some taxonomically complex plant groups has enhanced our understanding of their biology. Such approaches provide objective and independent assessments of whether a given entity is distinct or not. This information can then be used to contribute towards the decision making process of which taxa to prioritise for conservation, and address specific questions regarding BAP listed species. In the long term, however, a broader issue needs tackling. Actively evolving groups often contain a series of localised lineages, as well as complex populations that exhibit atypical levels of morphological diversity. These types of diversity do not fit well into a ‘standard’ species-based conservation system. In most cases protection will best be supplied by designated site protection or wider countryside habitat schemes. Where additional protection is need, a conservation policy is required that accepts the diversity in these actively evolving groups for what it is, rather than trying to squeeze it into conservation legislation derived for taxa whose delimitation is routine.","PeriodicalId":365547,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Journal of Scotland","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Journal of Scotland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03746600308685048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Summary Groups of plants that are undergoing active diversification often do not fall into neat and tidy taxonomies. In such groups it can sometimes be very difficult to establish what does, and what does not, constitute a species. This presents problems for species-based conservation programmes that are based around prioritised species-lists (e.g. the UK Biodiversity Action Plans; BAPs), particularly as the inclusion or exclusion of taxa on these lists largely determines the allocation of conservation resources. This is an important issue as almost half of the BAP priority higher plant species for which Scotland has prime responsibility are taxonomically controversial. Recent research using population genetic approaches to tackle some taxonomically complex plant groups has enhanced our understanding of their biology. Such approaches provide objective and independent assessments of whether a given entity is distinct or not. This information can then be used to contribute towards the decision making process of which taxa to prioritise for conservation, and address specific questions regarding BAP listed species. In the long term, however, a broader issue needs tackling. Actively evolving groups often contain a series of localised lineages, as well as complex populations that exhibit atypical levels of morphological diversity. These types of diversity do not fit well into a ‘standard’ species-based conservation system. In most cases protection will best be supplied by designated site protection or wider countryside habitat schemes. Where additional protection is need, a conservation policy is required that accepts the diversity in these actively evolving groups for what it is, rather than trying to squeeze it into conservation legislation derived for taxa whose delimitation is routine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰的分类复杂性、种群遗传学和植物保护
正在经历积极多样化的植物群往往不能归入整齐的分类。在这样的群体中,有时很难确定什么构成一个物种,什么不构成一个物种。这给基于优先物种清单的物种保护计划带来了问题(例如,英国生物多样性行动计划;特别是这些名单上的分类群的列入或排除在很大程度上决定了保护资源的分配。这是一个重要的问题,因为几乎一半的BAP优先高等植物物种在分类学上存在争议,而苏格兰对这些物种负有主要责任。最近的研究使用群体遗传方法来解决一些分类上复杂的植物群,提高了我们对其生物学的理解。这种方法对某一实体是否独特提供了客观和独立的评估。然后,这些信息可以用于帮助制定优先保护的分类群的决策过程,并解决有关BAP所列物种的具体问题。然而,从长远来看,一个更广泛的问题需要解决。积极进化的群体通常包含一系列的局部谱系,以及表现出非典型形态多样性水平的复杂群体。这些类型的多样性并不适合“标准的”以物种为基础的保护系统。在大多数情况下,最佳的保护措施是指定地点保护或更广泛的郊野生境计划。在需要额外保护的地方,需要一项保护政策,接受这些积极进化的群体的多样性,而不是试图将其挤进为常规划分的分类群而制定的保护立法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I. Report On Temperature And Vegetation During February 1894 XXV. Open-Air Vegetation at the Royal Botanic Garden I. Report On Vegetation During The Month Of December 1895 I. Report On Temperature And Vegetation During March 1894 Observations On The Structure Of Zygophyllum Fabago, Linn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1