Reconciling Bilateral Trade Data for Use in GTAP

M. Gehlhar
{"title":"Reconciling Bilateral Trade Data for Use in GTAP","authors":"M. Gehlhar","doi":"10.21642/gtap.tp10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bilateral trade flows are reported by both importers and exporters. Large discrepancies in reported import/export trade flows can be found when these two reports are compared. The GTAP database requires consistency between the export flow and its corresponding import flow for all partner pairs. Therefore, bilateral trade data in its reported form cannot be directly used for GTAP. Various methods can be used to produce a consistent set of bilateral trade flows. However, achieving consistency alone does not necessarily provide credible trade flows. Matrix balancing using trade totals published by international agencies is not appropriate since these totals are not reconciled but are simply totals from country-reported flows. A method is developed with the aim of extracting the most reliable reported trade flows from reported import and export flows. Specific examples are used to illustrate how discrepancies can result from reporting errors and transport margins. Evidence is shown indicating that discrepancies often arise from erroneous reporting by one of the partners. Systematic reporting errors associated with a reporter can be measured by the share of consistent transactions with partners. The most reliable reported flows are selected based on credibility of reporters. The source of international bilateral trade for GTAP is United Nations COMTRADE database. It contains the complete set of countries in the world and the set of commodities covering total merchandise trade. Since errors in reporting are country-commodity specific, data is processed at the individual country and SITC 4-digit level before aggregating to the 30-region 31- merchandise trade commodity database in version 3 of the GTAP data base.","PeriodicalId":281904,"journal":{"name":"GTAP Technical Paper Series","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GTAP Technical Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21642/gtap.tp10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

Bilateral trade flows are reported by both importers and exporters. Large discrepancies in reported import/export trade flows can be found when these two reports are compared. The GTAP database requires consistency between the export flow and its corresponding import flow for all partner pairs. Therefore, bilateral trade data in its reported form cannot be directly used for GTAP. Various methods can be used to produce a consistent set of bilateral trade flows. However, achieving consistency alone does not necessarily provide credible trade flows. Matrix balancing using trade totals published by international agencies is not appropriate since these totals are not reconciled but are simply totals from country-reported flows. A method is developed with the aim of extracting the most reliable reported trade flows from reported import and export flows. Specific examples are used to illustrate how discrepancies can result from reporting errors and transport margins. Evidence is shown indicating that discrepancies often arise from erroneous reporting by one of the partners. Systematic reporting errors associated with a reporter can be measured by the share of consistent transactions with partners. The most reliable reported flows are selected based on credibility of reporters. The source of international bilateral trade for GTAP is United Nations COMTRADE database. It contains the complete set of countries in the world and the set of commodities covering total merchandise trade. Since errors in reporting are country-commodity specific, data is processed at the individual country and SITC 4-digit level before aggregating to the 30-region 31- merchandise trade commodity database in version 3 of the GTAP data base.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协调双边贸易数据以供GTAP使用
双边贸易流量由进口商和出口商报告。在比较这两份报告时,可以发现报告的进出口贸易流量有很大差异。GTAP数据库要求所有合作伙伴对的导出流与其相应的导入流之间保持一致性。因此,报告形式的双边贸易数据不能直接用于GTAP。可以使用各种方法来产生一套一致的双边贸易流量。然而,仅仅实现一致性并不一定能提供可信的贸易流量。使用国际机构公布的贸易总额进行矩阵平衡是不合适的,因为这些总额没有核对,而只是国家报告的流量总额。开发了一种方法,旨在从报告的进出口流量中提取最可靠的报告贸易流量。具体的例子用于说明报告错误和运输差额如何导致差异。有证据表明,差异往往是由合作伙伴之一的错误报告引起的。与报告者相关的系统性报告错误可以通过与合作伙伴一致交易的份额来衡量。最可靠的报告流量是根据记者的可信度来选择的。GTAP的国际双边贸易来源是联合国商品贸易数据库。它包含了世界上所有的国家和涵盖全部商品贸易的商品。由于报告中的错误是针对国别商品的,因此在汇总到GTAP数据库第3版的30-区域31-商品贸易商品数据库之前,数据是在个别国家和SITC的4位数水平上处理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Trade Theory for CGE Modelling: the Armington, Krugman and Melitz Models Extending the GTAP Data Base and Model to Cover Domestic Support Issues using the EU as Example New Estimates of Soil and Biomass Carbon Stocks for Global Economic Models Agro-ecological Zone Emission Factor (AEZ-EF) Model (v47) Analysis of Climate Policies with GDyn-E
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1