A comparison of L2 and L1 speakers’ production of adverb positions in the Cardiff variety of Welsh

Bethan Lines
{"title":"A comparison of L2 and L1 speakers’ production of adverb positions in the Cardiff variety of Welsh","authors":"Bethan Lines","doi":"10.18063/fls.v4i1.1451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The grammaticality of adverb positions varies by language. Consequently, L2 and L1 speakers may differ from each other in their acquisition of adverb positions. Given that L2 Welsh speakers outnumber L1 Welsh speakers in Wales, differences in acquisition may change which adverb positions occur in contemporary Welsh. This study compares which adverb positions L2 and L1 speakers produce in the spoken data from Cardiff in the CorCenCC corpus (Knight et al., 2020) in order to identify any differences in acquisition. Comparisons of L2 and L1 English speakers find that L2 speakers consistently acquire novel adverb positions yet they frequently use ungrammatical adverb positions. They also do not acquire additional constraints on adverb positions. This study largely reinforces these findings. First, L2 Welsh speakers produce every adverb position that L1 speakers produce. Secondly, although the definiteness constraint that Borsley et al. (2009: 50) describe is not productive in the sample of Cardiff Welsh speakers, L1 speakers exhibit a heaviness constraint on V-Adv-O that L2 speakers do not. Therefore, L1 transfer neither inhibits the acquisition of adverb positions nor facilitates the acquisition of additional constraints. However, unlike L2 English speakers, L2 Welsh speakers do not produce ungrammatical adverb positions. This likely derives from the lack of transferable adverb positions between Welsh and English rather than a lack of transfer. Therefore, this sample of Cardiff Welsh reinforces the crosslinguistic consistency of L2 speakers’ acquisition of adverb positions. It also suggests that L2 Welsh speakers most likely diverge from L1 speakers in the contexts in which they use adverb positions rather than the adverb positions that they use. ","PeriodicalId":285689,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Linguistic Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum for Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18063/fls.v4i1.1451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The grammaticality of adverb positions varies by language. Consequently, L2 and L1 speakers may differ from each other in their acquisition of adverb positions. Given that L2 Welsh speakers outnumber L1 Welsh speakers in Wales, differences in acquisition may change which adverb positions occur in contemporary Welsh. This study compares which adverb positions L2 and L1 speakers produce in the spoken data from Cardiff in the CorCenCC corpus (Knight et al., 2020) in order to identify any differences in acquisition. Comparisons of L2 and L1 English speakers find that L2 speakers consistently acquire novel adverb positions yet they frequently use ungrammatical adverb positions. They also do not acquire additional constraints on adverb positions. This study largely reinforces these findings. First, L2 Welsh speakers produce every adverb position that L1 speakers produce. Secondly, although the definiteness constraint that Borsley et al. (2009: 50) describe is not productive in the sample of Cardiff Welsh speakers, L1 speakers exhibit a heaviness constraint on V-Adv-O that L2 speakers do not. Therefore, L1 transfer neither inhibits the acquisition of adverb positions nor facilitates the acquisition of additional constraints. However, unlike L2 English speakers, L2 Welsh speakers do not produce ungrammatical adverb positions. This likely derives from the lack of transferable adverb positions between Welsh and English rather than a lack of transfer. Therefore, this sample of Cardiff Welsh reinforces the crosslinguistic consistency of L2 speakers’ acquisition of adverb positions. It also suggests that L2 Welsh speakers most likely diverge from L1 speakers in the contexts in which they use adverb positions rather than the adverb positions that they use. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二语言和第一语言使用者在威尔士语加的夫变体中副词位置产生的比较
副词位置的语法因语言而异。因此,二语和母语使用者在副词位置习得上可能存在差异。考虑到威尔士的第二语言威尔士语使用者多于第一语言威尔士语使用者,习得的差异可能会改变当代威尔士语中副词位置的发生。本研究比较了CorCenCC语料库中来自卡迪夫的口语数据中L2和L1说话者产生的副词位置(Knight et al., 2020),以确定习得方面的任何差异。通过对二语和母语英语使用者的比较发现,二语使用者不断获得新的副词位置,但他们经常使用不符合语法的副词位置。它们在副词位置上也没有额外的限制。这项研究在很大程度上强化了这些发现。首先,第二语言威尔士语使用者会使用第一语言使用者使用的所有副词位置。其次,尽管Borsley等人(2009:50)所描述的确定性约束在卡迪夫威尔士语使用者的样本中没有产生效果,但L1使用者对v- advo表现出了L2使用者所没有的严重约束。因此,母语迁移既不会抑制副词位置的习得,也不会促进额外约束条件的习得。然而,与说第二语言英语的人不同,说第二语言威尔士语的人不会产生不合语法的副词位置。这可能是由于威尔士语和英语之间缺乏可转换的副词位置,而不是缺乏转换。因此,这个卡迪夫威尔士语的样本加强了二语说话者副词位置习得的跨语言一致性。它还表明,第二语言威尔士语使用者与第一语言使用者最有可能在使用副词位置的上下文中出现分歧,而不是他们使用的副词位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing Language Education through Multimodality: Insights from a Bibliographic Analysis Digital Competence of Future English Language Teachers: Influence of Age and Gender on Their Self-perception Research on the Acceptance of Crowdsourced Translation Platform Technologies by Translators From Tradition to Technology: Societal and Educational Impacts on Job Preferences in Oman Learning achievement in purposive communication of ESL college students: A blended learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1