Integrity Testing: A Projective Inventory Approach

A. Tripathi, A. Gupta, P. Kumar
{"title":"Integrity Testing: A Projective Inventory Approach","authors":"A. Tripathi, A. Gupta, P. Kumar","doi":"10.15614/IJPP/2020/V11I4/207682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to develop a projective inventory to measure integrity. The projective inventory (PI) is a 69 item (statements) scale consists of 6 situations designed to measure integrity. Integrity has six dimensions: a) Belief in higher order principles: truth, (b) Money as means not as end, (c) Moral courage: indifference to suffering, (d) Commitment to family and friends, (e) Involvement in corruption and (f) Favoritism. The projective inventory yields a total score and six scores corresponding to the dimensions of integrity. Each score was calculated according to agreement and disagreement to the statements given by the participants during the data collection. The results revealed that the average score on positive dimensions of integrity (moral courage: Indifference to suffering, truth & commitment respectively) were higher than the negative values traits of integrity (involvement in corruption & favoritism). Reliability of the projective inventory integrity is 0.94. The construct (convergent) validity of the test was examined in which the correlation of PI scores with Big Five personality attributes was found to be moderate, which indicates that PI measures something related to existing tools of integrity in slightly different manner. Factor analysis was carried out to find the factor structure of the scale. Factor analysis revealed three factors in terms of indifference to suffering commitment and truth. Taking all the dimensions of integrity together and analyzing the step-wise regression analysis, it was found that indifference to suffering is the best predictor of overall test followed by favoritism, commitment, corruption and truth.","PeriodicalId":228398,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of positive psychology","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of positive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15614/IJPP/2020/V11I4/207682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a projective inventory to measure integrity. The projective inventory (PI) is a 69 item (statements) scale consists of 6 situations designed to measure integrity. Integrity has six dimensions: a) Belief in higher order principles: truth, (b) Money as means not as end, (c) Moral courage: indifference to suffering, (d) Commitment to family and friends, (e) Involvement in corruption and (f) Favoritism. The projective inventory yields a total score and six scores corresponding to the dimensions of integrity. Each score was calculated according to agreement and disagreement to the statements given by the participants during the data collection. The results revealed that the average score on positive dimensions of integrity (moral courage: Indifference to suffering, truth & commitment respectively) were higher than the negative values traits of integrity (involvement in corruption & favoritism). Reliability of the projective inventory integrity is 0.94. The construct (convergent) validity of the test was examined in which the correlation of PI scores with Big Five personality attributes was found to be moderate, which indicates that PI measures something related to existing tools of integrity in slightly different manner. Factor analysis was carried out to find the factor structure of the scale. Factor analysis revealed three factors in terms of indifference to suffering commitment and truth. Taking all the dimensions of integrity together and analyzing the step-wise regression analysis, it was found that indifference to suffering is the best predictor of overall test followed by favoritism, commitment, corruption and truth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完整性测试:一种项目清单方法
本研究的目的是开发一种测量完整性的投射性量表。投射性清单(PI)是一个69项(陈述)量表,由6种情况组成,旨在衡量诚信。廉正有六个方面:a)对高阶原则的信仰:真理;(b)金钱是手段而不是目的;(c)道德勇气:对苦难漠不关心;(d)对家人和朋友的承诺;(e)参与腐败;(f)偏袒。投影清单产生一个总分和六个与完整性维度相对应的分数。每个分数是根据参与者在数据收集过程中给出的陈述的同意和不同意来计算的。结果显示,诚信的正面价值(道德勇气:对苦难的冷漠、诚实和承诺)的平均得分高于诚信的负面价值(参与腐败和偏袒)。投影库存完整性的信度为0.94。检验了测试的结构(收敛)效度,其中PI分数与大五人格属性的相关性发现是中等的,这表明PI以略有不同的方式测量与现有完整性工具相关的东西。进行因子分析,找出量表的因子结构。因子分析揭示了对苦难的冷漠、承诺和真相的三个影响因素。将诚信的各个维度综合起来进行逐步回归分析,发现对苦难的冷漠是整体测试的最佳预测因子,其次是偏袒、承诺、腐败和真相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological Distress and Resilience Among Transgenders “Laughing Matters”: The Relationship between Humor and Self-Esteem in School-going Indian Children Impact of Mother-child Interactiono on Academic Achievement of High School Students Effect of Time of Exposure to Prolonged War on Resilience of Soldiers Religious Orientation:An Exploration Towards Self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1