TCP performance over ATM on Linux and Windows NT

M. Borriss, U. Dannowski, H. Hartig
{"title":"TCP performance over ATM on Linux and Windows NT","authors":"M. Borriss, U. Dannowski, H. Hartig","doi":"10.1109/ICATM.1998.688214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's local area networks, ATM is often used as a replacement for slow Ethernet. This work measures and compares performance of the transmission control protocol (TCP) over ATM on two popular operating systems on PC hardware. Throughput and round trip latency of TCP data transfer over both Linux and Windows NT on identical hardware were measured. For throughput measurements, send and receive performances have been isolated by using a fast third-party machine as peer. Firstly, measurements indicated that high-end PC hardware can utilize the bandwidth provided by 155.52 Mbps ATM network adapters well. Running the heavyweight TCP protocol, data rates of up to 83% of the bandwidth available have been observed. As a second result, Linux and Windows NT bulk data throughput were competitive. However, particularly on slow hardware, the Linux implementation consistently outperformed NT. Finally, significant latency differences in the order of a 50% advantage for Linux were indicated by the request-response test suite.","PeriodicalId":257298,"journal":{"name":"1998 1st IEEE International Conference on ATM. ICATM'98","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1998 1st IEEE International Conference on ATM. ICATM'98","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATM.1998.688214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In today's local area networks, ATM is often used as a replacement for slow Ethernet. This work measures and compares performance of the transmission control protocol (TCP) over ATM on two popular operating systems on PC hardware. Throughput and round trip latency of TCP data transfer over both Linux and Windows NT on identical hardware were measured. For throughput measurements, send and receive performances have been isolated by using a fast third-party machine as peer. Firstly, measurements indicated that high-end PC hardware can utilize the bandwidth provided by 155.52 Mbps ATM network adapters well. Running the heavyweight TCP protocol, data rates of up to 83% of the bandwidth available have been observed. As a second result, Linux and Windows NT bulk data throughput were competitive. However, particularly on slow hardware, the Linux implementation consistently outperformed NT. Finally, significant latency differences in the order of a 50% advantage for Linux were indicated by the request-response test suite.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Linux和Windows NT上通过ATM的TCP性能
在今天的局域网中,ATM经常被用作慢速以太网的替代品。这项工作在两种流行的PC硬件操作系统上测量和比较ATM上的传输控制协议(TCP)的性能。在相同的硬件上对Linux和Windows NT上TCP数据传输的吞吐量和往返延迟进行了测量。对于吞吐量测量,通过使用快速的第三方机器作为对等体来隔离发送和接收性能。首先,测量表明高端PC硬件可以很好地利用155.52 Mbps ATM网卡提供的带宽。运行重量级TCP协议,可以观察到高达83%可用带宽的数据速率。第二个结果是,Linux和Windows NT的批量数据吞吐量具有竞争力。但是,特别是在慢速硬件上,Linux实现的性能始终优于NT。最后,请求-响应测试套件表明,Linux的延迟差异显著,大约为50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart IP switching: a hybrid system for fast IP-based network backbones Multi-layer simulation approach for evaluation of data service support in ATM networks Agents based approach for QoS adaptation in distributed multimedia applications over ATM networks A new approach for combined performance evaluation of wireless ATM at channel and higher protocol levels On the design of a high-performance ATM bridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1