Teaching University-Level Technology Students Via the Learning Preferences and Problem-Solving Approach

S. Scott, Doug Koch
{"title":"Teaching University-Level Technology Students Via the Learning Preferences and Problem-Solving Approach","authors":"S. Scott, Doug Koch","doi":"10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on how technology educators can challenge students to “think” about technical problems. A key aspect of success in quality problem solving is understanding learning preferences and problem-solving approaches. The Learning Style Inventory (LSI) can be used to assess an individual’s ideal way to learn, in essence, a person’s learning preference (Kolb, 1984). It also can be beneficial to understand how students approach problems. The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI) can be used to measure an individual’s problem-solving approach (Kirton, 1999). The purpose of this study was to determine the most effective way to teach university-level technology students to solve problems, according to their learning preferences and problem-solving approaches. The results of the study indicated that a majority of the technology students had a combination of learning preferences. The next highest percent and frequency of the students’ learning preferences was accommodating. In addition, the students in this study were both adaptive and innovative in their problem-solving approaches. One way to effectively teach problem solving to university-level technology students is to form teams of students whose members have differing learning preferences and approaches. Moreover, educators can provide learning activities that address the phases of the learning cycle and the ways in which students like to approach problems. Introduction The ever-changing technical work environment requires students to think fast and solve complex global problems. It is estimated that the root of problems in many organizations is a result of ineffective thinking (Wiele, 1998). Employers depend on technology educators to develop quality thinkers. Technology educators aim to give students a “high tech” education. This “high tech” education often means skills in computer-aided drafting, robotics, telecommunications, and quality assurance tools. However, are educators challenging students to “think” about technical problems? Starkweather (1997) argued that educators teach students to use equipment, but they often fail to teach technical problem solving, which is a higher order thinking skill. Williams (2001) agreed, acknowledging that teachers should focus on how to think rather than what to think. Each individual has a preference to his or her thinking. The Learning Style Inventory (LSI) can be used to assess an individual’s ideal way to learn, in essence, his or her learning preference (Kolb, 1984). Another measure of thinking is the way in which students approach problems. The Kirton AdaptionInnovation Inventory (KAI) can be used to assess a person’s approach to solving problems (Kirton, 2000). Understanding learning preferences and problemsolving approaches can help students to become quality thinkers and problem solvers. Currently, there is little research on learning preferences and problem-solving approaches among university-level technology students. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study was to determine the most effective way to teach university-level technology students problem solving according to their learning preferences and problem-solving approaches. In order for students to make the most of their education, understanding their learning preference and approach to problem solving is essential. The research questions for this study are as follows: 1. What is the learning preference of technology students enrolled in an Industrial Engineering Department at a Midwestern university? 2. What is the problem-solving approach of technology students enrolled in an Industrial Engineering Department at a Midwestern university? 3. What is the most effective way to teach university-level technology students problem solving based on their preferences and approaches? The data gathered in this study can help students and educators understand problem solving and the way in which they prefer to learn and approach problems. The results of this study may influence the way in which educators T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Teaching University-Level Technology Students via the Learning Preferences and Problem-Solving Approach. Sophia Scott and Doug Koch 16","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article focuses on how technology educators can challenge students to “think” about technical problems. A key aspect of success in quality problem solving is understanding learning preferences and problem-solving approaches. The Learning Style Inventory (LSI) can be used to assess an individual’s ideal way to learn, in essence, a person’s learning preference (Kolb, 1984). It also can be beneficial to understand how students approach problems. The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI) can be used to measure an individual’s problem-solving approach (Kirton, 1999). The purpose of this study was to determine the most effective way to teach university-level technology students to solve problems, according to their learning preferences and problem-solving approaches. The results of the study indicated that a majority of the technology students had a combination of learning preferences. The next highest percent and frequency of the students’ learning preferences was accommodating. In addition, the students in this study were both adaptive and innovative in their problem-solving approaches. One way to effectively teach problem solving to university-level technology students is to form teams of students whose members have differing learning preferences and approaches. Moreover, educators can provide learning activities that address the phases of the learning cycle and the ways in which students like to approach problems. Introduction The ever-changing technical work environment requires students to think fast and solve complex global problems. It is estimated that the root of problems in many organizations is a result of ineffective thinking (Wiele, 1998). Employers depend on technology educators to develop quality thinkers. Technology educators aim to give students a “high tech” education. This “high tech” education often means skills in computer-aided drafting, robotics, telecommunications, and quality assurance tools. However, are educators challenging students to “think” about technical problems? Starkweather (1997) argued that educators teach students to use equipment, but they often fail to teach technical problem solving, which is a higher order thinking skill. Williams (2001) agreed, acknowledging that teachers should focus on how to think rather than what to think. Each individual has a preference to his or her thinking. The Learning Style Inventory (LSI) can be used to assess an individual’s ideal way to learn, in essence, his or her learning preference (Kolb, 1984). Another measure of thinking is the way in which students approach problems. The Kirton AdaptionInnovation Inventory (KAI) can be used to assess a person’s approach to solving problems (Kirton, 2000). Understanding learning preferences and problemsolving approaches can help students to become quality thinkers and problem solvers. Currently, there is little research on learning preferences and problem-solving approaches among university-level technology students. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study was to determine the most effective way to teach university-level technology students problem solving according to their learning preferences and problem-solving approaches. In order for students to make the most of their education, understanding their learning preference and approach to problem solving is essential. The research questions for this study are as follows: 1. What is the learning preference of technology students enrolled in an Industrial Engineering Department at a Midwestern university? 2. What is the problem-solving approach of technology students enrolled in an Industrial Engineering Department at a Midwestern university? 3. What is the most effective way to teach university-level technology students problem solving based on their preferences and approaches? The data gathered in this study can help students and educators understand problem solving and the way in which they prefer to learn and approach problems. The results of this study may influence the way in which educators T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Teaching University-Level Technology Students via the Learning Preferences and Problem-Solving Approach. Sophia Scott and Doug Koch 16
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于学习偏好和问题解决方法的大学技术类学生教学
本文关注的是技术教育者如何挑战学生去“思考”技术问题。成功解决高质量问题的一个关键方面是理解学习偏好和解决问题的方法。学习风格量表(LSI)可以用来评估一个人理想的学习方式,本质上是一个人的学习偏好(Kolb, 1984)。了解学生是如何解决问题的也是有益的。Kirton适应创新量表(KAI)可以用来衡量个人解决问题的方法(Kirton, 1999)。本研究的目的是根据大学技术学生的学习偏好和解决问题的方法,确定最有效的方法来教他们解决问题。研究结果表明,大多数技术学生具有学习偏好的组合。学生学习偏好的第二高百分比和频率是适应。此外,本研究的学生在解决问题的方法上既有适应性又有创新性。有效地向大学水平的技术学生教授解决问题的方法之一是组成学生团队,成员之间有不同的学习偏好和方法。此外,教育工作者可以提供学习活动,以解决学习周期的各个阶段和学生喜欢解决问题的方式。不断变化的技术工作环境要求学生快速思考并解决复杂的全球性问题。据估计,许多组织中问题的根源是低效思维的结果(Wiele, 1998)。雇主依靠技术教育工作者来培养高质量的思考者。技术教育者的目标是给学生提供“高科技”教育。这种“高科技”教育通常意味着计算机辅助制图、机器人、电信和质量保证工具方面的技能。然而,教育者是否在挑战学生去“思考”技术问题呢?Starkweather(1997)认为,教育工作者教学生使用设备,但他们往往不能教解决技术问题,这是一种更高层次的思维技能。Williams(2001)同意这一观点,他承认教师应该关注如何思考而不是思考什么。每个人都有他或她的思维偏好。学习风格量表(LSI)可以用来评估一个人理想的学习方式,本质上是他或她的学习偏好(Kolb, 1984)。思考的另一个衡量标准是学生处理问题的方式。Kirton适应创新量表(KAI)可以用来评估一个人解决问题的方法(Kirton, 2000)。了解学习偏好和解决问题的方法可以帮助学生成为高质量的思考者和问题解决者。目前,对工科大学生的学习偏好和问题解决方式的研究较少。本研究的目的是根据大学技术学生的学习偏好和解决问题的方法,确定最有效的方法来教授他们解决问题的能力。为了让学生充分利用他们的教育,了解他们的学习偏好和解决问题的方法是必不可少的。本研究的研究问题如下:1。中西部大学工业工程系的技术专业学生的学习偏好是什么?2. 中西部大学工业工程系的技术专业学生解决问题的方法是什么?3.根据学生的喜好和方法,教授他们解决问题的最有效方法是什么?本研究收集的数据可以帮助学生和教育工作者了解解决问题的方法,以及他们喜欢学习和处理问题的方式。本研究的结果可能会影响教育工作者如何利用学习偏好和问题解决方法来教育大学水平的技术型学生。索菲娅·斯科特和道格·科赫
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology Education in New Zealand Comparing Functions, Costs, and Rewards of Quality Engineers and Six Sigma Black Belts Immediate impact of dynamic graphics instruction on learners of varied levels of spatial ability Effects of Mobile Phones on Students’ Academic Performance in Religious Education Teacher Shortage and Alternative Licensure Solutions for Technical Educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1