Effects of group membership, intergroup competition, and out-group ethnicity on children’s ratings of in-group and out-group similarity and positivity

D. Nesdale, J. Griffiths, K. Durkin, A. Maass
{"title":"Effects of group membership, intergroup competition, and out-group ethnicity on children’s ratings of in-group and out-group similarity and positivity","authors":"D. Nesdale, J. Griffiths, K. Durkin, A. Maass","doi":"10.1348/026151006X150382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on self-categorization theory (SCT; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), this study examined the extent to which 7- and 10-year-old children's perceptions of similarity to, and positivity towards, their in-group would be increased by factors predicted to enhance the salience of in-group–out-group categorizations. In a minimal group study, participants met the in-group before or after the out-group (group timing), the out-group had the same or different ethnicity as the in-group (out-group ethnicity), and there was or was not to be a competition between the in-group and the out-group (intergroup competition). Ratings of the in-group similarity were influenced by the out-group ethnicity, but not by group timing or intergroup competition. Consistent with SCT, participants rated themselves as more similar to the in-group when the out-group had different vs. the same ethnicity. SCT's predictions concerning in-group positivity were not confirmed. Instead, participants rated the in-group more positively than the out-group and the in-group was rated more positively, when participants met the in-group before rather than after the out-group. Older compared with younger participants were also more prepared to change groups when the out-group had different ethnicity. The implications for SCT are discussed.","PeriodicalId":224518,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Development Psychology","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Development Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1348/026151006X150382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Based on self-categorization theory (SCT; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), this study examined the extent to which 7- and 10-year-old children's perceptions of similarity to, and positivity towards, their in-group would be increased by factors predicted to enhance the salience of in-group–out-group categorizations. In a minimal group study, participants met the in-group before or after the out-group (group timing), the out-group had the same or different ethnicity as the in-group (out-group ethnicity), and there was or was not to be a competition between the in-group and the out-group (intergroup competition). Ratings of the in-group similarity were influenced by the out-group ethnicity, but not by group timing or intergroup competition. Consistent with SCT, participants rated themselves as more similar to the in-group when the out-group had different vs. the same ethnicity. SCT's predictions concerning in-group positivity were not confirmed. Instead, participants rated the in-group more positively than the out-group and the in-group was rated more positively, when participants met the in-group before rather than after the out-group. Older compared with younger participants were also more prepared to change groups when the out-group had different ethnicity. The implications for SCT are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体成员、群体间竞争和群体外种族对儿童群体内和群体外相似性和积极性评价的影响
基于自我分类理论;Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987),本研究考察了7岁和10岁儿童对其内群体的相似性和对其内群体的积极性的感知会被预测的增强内群体-外群体分类显著性的因素所增加的程度。在最小群体研究中,参与者在外群体之前或之后遇到内群体(群体时间),外群体与内群体具有相同或不同的种族(外群体种族),内群体与外群体之间存在或不存在竞争(群体间竞争)。群体内相似性的评分受群体外种族的影响,但不受群体时间或群体间竞争的影响。与SCT一致的是,当外群体的种族不同与相同时,参与者认为自己与内群体更相似。SCT对群体内阳性的预测没有得到证实。相反,参与者对内组的评价比外组更积极,而且当参与者在外组之前而不是之后见到内组时,对内组的评价更积极。与年轻的参与者相比,年长的参与者也更愿意在外群体有不同种族的情况下改变群体。讨论了SCT的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task: Use of task goals Is there an alternative to simulation and theory in understanding the mind Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning in Children with and without Down's Syndrome. Parents, parenting, and children's sleep problems: Exploring reciprocal effects Can Children Construct Inverse Relations in Arithmetic? Evidence for Individual Differences in the Development of Conceptual Understanding and Computational Skill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1