Cláusulas arbitrais em números no mercado de capitais brasileiro

Mariana Pargendler, Viviane Muller Prado, Ezequiel Fajreldines Santos, Dalila Martins Viol
{"title":"Cláusulas arbitrais em números no mercado de capitais brasileiro","authors":"Mariana Pargendler, Viviane Muller Prado, Ezequiel Fajreldines Santos, Dalila Martins Viol","doi":"10.54648/rba2022028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements.\nEmpirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements. Empirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西资本市场的仲裁条款数量
本实证研究更新并扩展了2014年发表的关于巴西上市公司使用仲裁条款的研究,以阐明巴西资本市场仲裁领域的现状和最新发展。2021年,共有234家上市公司在公司章程中加入仲裁条款,占B3类上市公司的61%。即使是在传统和一级市场,仲裁不是强制性的,27%的公司在其公司章程中有仲裁条款,而2013年只有15%。此外,在41%有股东协议的上市公司中,77%的公司选择仲裁,而2013年这一比例为70%。尽管很大一部分公司尚未采用仲裁条款,但我们观察到,2013年至2021年期间,上市公司采用仲裁的情况略有增加。在2021年最后一个季度,Ibovespa指数中18%的公司在其公司章程中没有仲裁条款。在非强制性仲裁的情况下,76%的传统和一级市场上市公司以及61%的股东协议中有仲裁条款的公司选择了市场仲裁委员会(cmara de Arbitragem do Mercado)。实证研究;资本市场;上市公司;仲裁条款;仲裁;公司章程;股东协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breaking Ground or Playing Safe? Evaluating the Proposed Changes in German Arbitration Law Extensão da cláusula compromissória em contratos coligados: análise doutrinária e jurisprudencial Rapport de Synthèse da XVII Conferência Internacional de Arbitragem do Rio de Janeiro – Inovações Processuais e a Busca pela Eficiência A Inteligência Artificial e o seu contributo para o processo de mediação (na forma de negociação assistida por terceiro independente e imparcial). Um robô mediador ou um algoritmo pacificador de conflitos? Relato sobre o 11th ICC Brazilian Arbitration Day – 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1