OPINIONS OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS, PUERPERANT AND COMPANIONS ABOUT THE MALE MIDWIFE

Sibel İçke, Melek BALÇIK ÇOLAK
{"title":"OPINIONS OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS, PUERPERANT AND COMPANIONS ABOUT THE MALE MIDWIFE","authors":"Sibel İçke, Melek BALÇIK ÇOLAK","doi":"10.46648/GNJ.194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and aim: The midwifery profession is generally known as a profession that women choose and perform. In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of the students studying in the midwifery department, and the puerperant and companions in the obstetrics. Method: It’s a cross-sectional analytical study. The data were collected through forms prepared by the researchers. The universe of the study consisted of Midwifery Department students studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences of a state university, and all women who gave birth in two separate state hospitals and their attendants. The sample of the study consisted of 221 students, 72 puerperant and 72 companions who agreed to participate in the study with the improbable sampling method between December, 2019 and February, 2020 and met the inclusion criteria. In the analysis of the research data, number and percentage distributions were taken, chi-square test and one-way ANOVA analysis were performed. Results: 85.1% of the students stated that the lack of male recruitment had no effect on their choice of midwifery, 48.4% stated that they wanted to work with the male midwife in their professional lives, 46.6% stated that men could contribute to the strengthening of the profession. 47.2% of the puerperant states that midwifery is a woman's profession, 44.4% of them do not approve of men being a midwife profession, 59.4% of those who do not agree do not want male midwives because of their embarrassment. 58.3% of the companions stated that they approve of male midwives to be in the profession and 52.8% stated that they would not be disturbed in terms of the care given by the male midwife to their puerperants by the male midwife. Conclusions and recommendations: It’s determined that the inclusion of males in the midwifery profession is better welcomed by students and companions; puerperants have reservations. Efforts should be made to eliminate the gender gap in providing healthcare services.","PeriodicalId":394509,"journal":{"name":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46648/GNJ.194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and aim: The midwifery profession is generally known as a profession that women choose and perform. In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of the students studying in the midwifery department, and the puerperant and companions in the obstetrics. Method: It’s a cross-sectional analytical study. The data were collected through forms prepared by the researchers. The universe of the study consisted of Midwifery Department students studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences of a state university, and all women who gave birth in two separate state hospitals and their attendants. The sample of the study consisted of 221 students, 72 puerperant and 72 companions who agreed to participate in the study with the improbable sampling method between December, 2019 and February, 2020 and met the inclusion criteria. In the analysis of the research data, number and percentage distributions were taken, chi-square test and one-way ANOVA analysis were performed. Results: 85.1% of the students stated that the lack of male recruitment had no effect on their choice of midwifery, 48.4% stated that they wanted to work with the male midwife in their professional lives, 46.6% stated that men could contribute to the strengthening of the profession. 47.2% of the puerperant states that midwifery is a woman's profession, 44.4% of them do not approve of men being a midwife profession, 59.4% of those who do not agree do not want male midwives because of their embarrassment. 58.3% of the companions stated that they approve of male midwives to be in the profession and 52.8% stated that they would not be disturbed in terms of the care given by the male midwife to their puerperants by the male midwife. Conclusions and recommendations: It’s determined that the inclusion of males in the midwifery profession is better welcomed by students and companions; puerperants have reservations. Efforts should be made to eliminate the gender gap in providing healthcare services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产学学生、产妇及陪伴者对男助产士的看法
简介和目的:助产专业通常被称为妇女选择和执行的职业。在我们的研究中,旨在评估在产科学习的学生,以及在产科的产妇和陪伴者的意见。方法:采用横断面分析方法。数据是通过研究人员准备的表格收集的。研究对象包括在一所州立大学健康科学学院学习的助产系学生,以及在两家独立的州立医院分娩的所有妇女及其护理人员。该研究的样本包括221名学生,72名产妇和72名同伴,他们同意在2019年12月至2020年2月期间以不可能的抽样方法参与研究,并符合纳入标准。在对研究资料的分析中,采用数量分布和百分比分布,卡方检验和单因素方差分析。结果:85.1%的学生表示缺乏男性招聘对他们选择助产没有影响,48.4%的学生表示他们希望在他们的职业生涯中与男性助产士一起工作,46.6%的学生表示男性可以帮助加强该专业。47.2%的产妇认为助产士是女性的职业,44.4%的产妇不赞成男性成为助产士职业,59.4%不同意的产妇因为尴尬而不想要男性助产士。58.3%的陪产人表示他们赞成男助产士从事该行业,而52.8%的陪产人表示他们不会因男助产士对其产妇的照顾而感到不安。结论与建议:确定助产专业纳入男性更受学生和同伴的欢迎;产妇有保留意见。应努力消除在提供保健服务方面的性别差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correct Mask Usage Status, Pandemıc Perceptıon and Affectıng Factors in The Covıd-19 Pandemıc Process A New Age in Health: Metaverse The Effects of The Bongardia Chrysogonum (L) In A Rat Model of Diabetic Nephropathy Evaluatıon of Care Load and Emotıonal Intellıgence Level of Care for Cancer Patıents Artıfıcıal Intellıgence Methods in Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1