Writing a Book about India

R. Stoneman
{"title":"Writing a Book about India","authors":"R. Stoneman","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv3znwg5.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the challenges of writing a book about India. Three main points emerge from this discussion: (1) Our own presumptions about India make it hard for us to see writers like Nearchus, Onesicritus, and Megasthenes clearly, or to see India with their eyes. (2) Many of the authors who have formed our preconceptions can be used as corroborative detail for what is in the classical authors. Among the most valuable are Xuanzang, al-Biruni, Babur and even Mandeville. (3) Could our central authors—Nearchus, Onesicritus and Megasthenes—see India clearly, or did they look for what Ctesias and Scylax had taught them to expect? Because the earlier authors are lost to us this is very difficult to estimate. With this in mind, one should always test them against other available sources and their likely Indian informants.","PeriodicalId":202547,"journal":{"name":"The Greek Experience of India","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Greek Experience of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv3znwg5.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses the challenges of writing a book about India. Three main points emerge from this discussion: (1) Our own presumptions about India make it hard for us to see writers like Nearchus, Onesicritus, and Megasthenes clearly, or to see India with their eyes. (2) Many of the authors who have formed our preconceptions can be used as corroborative detail for what is in the classical authors. Among the most valuable are Xuanzang, al-Biruni, Babur and even Mandeville. (3) Could our central authors—Nearchus, Onesicritus and Megasthenes—see India clearly, or did they look for what Ctesias and Scylax had taught them to expect? Because the earlier authors are lost to us this is very difficult to estimate. With this in mind, one should always test them against other available sources and their likely Indian informants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写一本关于印度的书
这一章讨论了写一本关于印度的书所面临的挑战。从这个讨论中可以得出三个主要观点:(1)我们自己对印度的假设使我们很难清楚地看到像尼阿库斯、奥尼西克里图和梅加西尼这样的作家,或者用他们的眼睛看印度。(2)许多形成了我们先入为主观念的作者,都可以作为经典作者作品的确证细节。其中最有价值的是玄奘、比鲁尼、巴布尔,甚至曼德维尔。(3)我们的中心作者——尼阿库斯、奥尼西克里图和迈加西尼——能清楚地看到印度吗?还是他们只是在寻找克特西亚斯和斯基拉克斯教导他们的那种期待?因为我们已经找不到早期的作者了这很难估计。考虑到这一点,人们应该总是将他们与其他可用的消息来源和可能的印度线人进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
6. Megasthenes’ Book 5. Introducing Megasthenes 12. Two Hundred Years of Debate: Greek and Indian Thought 9. The Question of Utopia 13. The Trojan Elephant: Two Hundred Years of Co-existence from the Death of Alexander to the Death of Menander, 323 to 135 BCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1