Genre and paradigm in the second book of de oratore

M. Leff
{"title":"Genre and paradigm in the second book of de oratore","authors":"M. Leff","doi":"10.1080/10417948609372669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cicero's analysis of genre in Book II of De oratore is a subtle effort to balance and synthesize the conflicting theoretical positions of Isocrates and Aristotle. In the dialogue, Cicero relies on ironic eloquence to explain the nature of eloquence, and, through this merger of theory and practice, the rival conceptions of oratory as systematic art and synthetic practice coalesce. As Cicero presents it, the generic frame is only a convenient fiction incapable of representing the data of the art. Through his effort to understand competing theoretical systems, Cicero identifies an issue of abiding concern—the opposition between a perspective grounded in practice and a perspective oriented toward the abstract principles that define rhetoric as a coherent realm of experience.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"430 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948609372669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Cicero's analysis of genre in Book II of De oratore is a subtle effort to balance and synthesize the conflicting theoretical positions of Isocrates and Aristotle. In the dialogue, Cicero relies on ironic eloquence to explain the nature of eloquence, and, through this merger of theory and practice, the rival conceptions of oratory as systematic art and synthetic practice coalesce. As Cicero presents it, the generic frame is only a convenient fiction incapable of representing the data of the art. Through his effort to understand competing theoretical systems, Cicero identifies an issue of abiding concern—the opposition between a perspective grounded in practice and a perspective oriented toward the abstract principles that define rhetoric as a coherent realm of experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论《装饰论》第二卷中的体裁和范式
西塞罗在《论奥拉托雷》第二卷中对体裁的分析是一种微妙的努力,以平衡和综合伊索克拉底和亚里士多德相互冲突的理论立场。在对话中,西塞罗依靠讽刺口才来解释口才的本质,并通过这种理论与实践的融合,将演讲作为系统艺术和综合实践的对立概念结合起来。正如西塞罗所提出的那样,一般框架只是一种方便的虚构,无法代表艺术的数据。通过努力理解相互竞争的理论体系,西塞罗发现了一个持久关注的问题——以实践为基础的观点与以抽象原则为导向的观点之间的对立,后者将修辞学定义为连贯的经验领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Whither applied interpersonal communication research: A practical perspective for practicing practitioners The importance of context in applied communication research Relational communication in applied contexts: Current status and future directions Differences in how physicians and patients perceive physicians’ relational communication Privacy in marital relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1