ENVIRONMENTAL TAXATION IN THE UK: THE CLIMATE CHANGE LEVY AND POLICY MAKING

J. McEldowney, D. Salter
{"title":"ENVIRONMENTAL TAXATION IN THE UK: THE CLIMATE CHANGE LEVY AND POLICY MAKING","authors":"J. McEldowney, D. Salter","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V28I0.1276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental taxation is different from many other forms of taxation as it is not only used to raise revenue but it is also able to marginally influence behaviour to protect and enhance the environment. It provides valuable market led mechanisms to help limit greenhouse gas emissions, encourage sustainable behaviour and improve environmental performance to address climate change. The Post Paris (COP21) agreement provides a framework for global actions to address climate change and this sets the context for the discussion of environmental taxation. Environmental taxes have enormous potential to change carbon usage. In 2012, the Coalition Government (2010-2015) opined that the definition of an environmental tax includes three principles, namely that the tax is explicitly linked to the government’s environmental objectives, that the primary objective of the tax is to encourage environmentally positive behaviour, and that the tax is structured in relation to environmental objectives, particularly the more polluting the behaviour the greater tax levied. The current Government has adopted and applied this definition. By way of contrast, the definitions of environmental taxation favoured by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), respectively, give a wider remit for environmental taxation and policy making and include, for instance, various transport taxes which, as will be seen, do not fall within the Government’s definition of an environmental tax. The Climate Change Levy, which is the focus of this article, was introduced as one of a series of new environmental taxes on business energy use in 2001. It is charged on electricity, gas liquefied petroleum gas and solid fuels used by business. Generally, environmental taxes are intended to increase investments in renewable technologies while reducing carbon emissions, but they are vulnerable to political influence and policy changes. Thus, the rationale for environmental or ‘Green’ taxes has shifted perceptibly to raising revenue rather than enabling government to meet its obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008. Environmental taxes are also susceptible to oil prices and fluctuations in the global economy. The North Sea oil and gas industry is going through a difficult period of retrenchment. A recent independent report has suggested that the industry has two years to adjust to changing economic circumstances. Inevitably, this will impact on the tax revenues raised from this sector. In an ideal world, environmental taxes should be easy to avoid through a change in behaviour and, consequently, hard to evade. Environmental taxes provide important means to achieve policy objectives, but their full potential requires public support and, especially, engagement by the business community. The future of environmental taxes may depend on the success of ‘green’ investment. There is a case for introducing a single climate tax on business. Undoubtedly, environmental taxes deserve greater attention in the economic toolbox to meet climate change commitments. The UK faces some difficult policy decisions under the Climate Change Act 2008 to meet the 2030 energy and climate change package targets. Currently, the UK receives 7.5 % of tax revenue from environmental taxes. To date, environmental taxation has had mixed outcomes in the UK, though few doubt its potential to define the future of carbon based energy use.","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V28I0.1276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Environmental taxation is different from many other forms of taxation as it is not only used to raise revenue but it is also able to marginally influence behaviour to protect and enhance the environment. It provides valuable market led mechanisms to help limit greenhouse gas emissions, encourage sustainable behaviour and improve environmental performance to address climate change. The Post Paris (COP21) agreement provides a framework for global actions to address climate change and this sets the context for the discussion of environmental taxation. Environmental taxes have enormous potential to change carbon usage. In 2012, the Coalition Government (2010-2015) opined that the definition of an environmental tax includes three principles, namely that the tax is explicitly linked to the government’s environmental objectives, that the primary objective of the tax is to encourage environmentally positive behaviour, and that the tax is structured in relation to environmental objectives, particularly the more polluting the behaviour the greater tax levied. The current Government has adopted and applied this definition. By way of contrast, the definitions of environmental taxation favoured by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), respectively, give a wider remit for environmental taxation and policy making and include, for instance, various transport taxes which, as will be seen, do not fall within the Government’s definition of an environmental tax. The Climate Change Levy, which is the focus of this article, was introduced as one of a series of new environmental taxes on business energy use in 2001. It is charged on electricity, gas liquefied petroleum gas and solid fuels used by business. Generally, environmental taxes are intended to increase investments in renewable technologies while reducing carbon emissions, but they are vulnerable to political influence and policy changes. Thus, the rationale for environmental or ‘Green’ taxes has shifted perceptibly to raising revenue rather than enabling government to meet its obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008. Environmental taxes are also susceptible to oil prices and fluctuations in the global economy. The North Sea oil and gas industry is going through a difficult period of retrenchment. A recent independent report has suggested that the industry has two years to adjust to changing economic circumstances. Inevitably, this will impact on the tax revenues raised from this sector. In an ideal world, environmental taxes should be easy to avoid through a change in behaviour and, consequently, hard to evade. Environmental taxes provide important means to achieve policy objectives, but their full potential requires public support and, especially, engagement by the business community. The future of environmental taxes may depend on the success of ‘green’ investment. There is a case for introducing a single climate tax on business. Undoubtedly, environmental taxes deserve greater attention in the economic toolbox to meet climate change commitments. The UK faces some difficult policy decisions under the Climate Change Act 2008 to meet the 2030 energy and climate change package targets. Currently, the UK receives 7.5 % of tax revenue from environmental taxes. To date, environmental taxation has had mixed outcomes in the UK, though few doubt its potential to define the future of carbon based energy use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国的环境税:气候变化税与政策制定
环境税不同于许多其他形式的税收,因为它不仅用于增加收入,而且还能够对保护和改善环境的行为产生轻微影响。它提供了有价值的市场主导机制,帮助限制温室气体排放,鼓励可持续行为,改善环境绩效,以应对气候变化。《后巴黎协定》(COP21)为应对气候变化的全球行动提供了一个框架,并为讨论环境税收奠定了基础。环境税在改变碳使用方面具有巨大的潜力。2012年,联合政府(2010-2015)认为,环境税的定义包括三个原则,即税收明确与政府的环境目标挂钩,税收的主要目标是鼓励环境积极行为,税收的结构与环境目标有关,特别是污染越严重的行为征收的税收越多。本届政府已经采纳并适用了这一定义。相比之下,国家统计局(ONS)和经济合作与发展组织(经合发组织)分别赞成的环境税的定义为环境税和政策制定提供了更广泛的职权范围,并包括,例如,各种运输税,如将看到的,不属于政府对环境税的定义。气候变化税是本文的重点,它是2001年对企业能源使用征收的一系列新环境税之一。它对电力、天然气、液化石油气和商业使用的固体燃料收费。一般来说,环境税的目的是增加对可再生技术的投资,同时减少碳排放,但它们容易受到政治影响和政策变化的影响。因此,环境或“绿色”税的基本原理已经明显转向增加收入,而不是使政府能够履行《2008年气候变化法案》规定的义务。环境税也容易受到石油价格和全球经济波动的影响。北海石油和天然气行业正在经历一段艰难的紧缩时期。最近的一份独立报告表明,该行业有两年的时间来适应不断变化的经济环境。这将不可避免地影响到该行业的税收收入。在一个理想的世界里,环境税应该很容易通过行为的改变来避免,因此也很难逃避。环境税是实现政策目标的重要手段,但要充分发挥其潜力,需要公众的支持,特别是商界的参与。环境税的未来可能取决于“绿色”投资的成功。对企业征收单一的气候税是有道理的。毫无疑问,环境税应该在经济工具箱中得到更多关注,以履行气候变化承诺。根据《2008年气候变化法案》,英国面临着一些艰难的政策决定,以实现2030年能源和气候变化一揽子目标。目前,英国7.5%的税收来自环境税。迄今为止,环境税在英国产生了好坏参半的结果,尽管很少有人怀疑它在确定碳基能源使用的未来方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Are the Legal Mechanisms for Seeking Solutions to Disparities in the Delivery of Care in the NHS and Where Does Liability Lie? Beneficial Ownership of the Family Home Apologies and the Legacy of an Unlawful Application of Terra Nullius in Terra Australis Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Contemporary Asian Reading of a Seminal Text ‘Not My Employee, Not My Liability’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1