{"title":"An Innovative Method to Predict the Accuracy of Phishing Websites by Comparing Logistic Regression Algorithm with Support Vector Machine Algorithm","authors":"Vallepu Rambabu, K. Malathi, R. Mahaveerakannan","doi":"10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare novel LR with the SVM technique to estimate the precision of phishing websites. Materials and Methods: The SVM method's algorithm for supervised learning (N = 20) is compared to the Logistic Regression algorithm's supervised learning algorithm (N = 20). To achieve great precision, the G power value is set to 0.8. Machine Learning is used in the framework. Compared to the SVM approach, LR has more precision (92.00%). (90.26%). With a confidence value of 95%, the impartial T-Test was run (p =.375), indicating the importance score that is statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusion: The LR approach appeared to detect phishing websites with greater accuracy than the SVM technique.","PeriodicalId":356949,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To compare novel LR with the SVM technique to estimate the precision of phishing websites. Materials and Methods: The SVM method's algorithm for supervised learning (N = 20) is compared to the Logistic Regression algorithm's supervised learning algorithm (N = 20). To achieve great precision, the G power value is set to 0.8. Machine Learning is used in the framework. Compared to the SVM approach, LR has more precision (92.00%). (90.26%). With a confidence value of 95%, the impartial T-Test was run (p =.375), indicating the importance score that is statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusion: The LR approach appeared to detect phishing websites with greater accuracy than the SVM technique.