Testing the reliability of the New General Service List Test (NGSLT) in order to better evaluate Japanese university students’ written receptive vocabulary levels

P. Nadasdy, Kazumi Aizawa, Tatsuo Iso
{"title":"Testing the reliability of the New General Service List Test (NGSLT) in order to better evaluate Japanese university students’ written receptive vocabulary levels","authors":"P. Nadasdy, Kazumi Aizawa, Tatsuo Iso","doi":"10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The New General Service List Test (NGSLT) (Stoeckel & Bennett, 2015) was designed as a diagnostic test to measure students’ written receptive vocabulary knowledge. This test battery was developed based upon the New General Service List (NGSL) (Browne, 2013), which makes it appealing to teachers in Japan, and especially those who see vocabulary as key to English as a foreign or second language learning. The research focused on finding out whether and to what degree the test accurately and reliably measures students’ vocabulary knowledge, and to find if there are any incongruences with the scores on this test and those on extraneous standards. Three versions of the NGSLT were distributed and a triangulation method was used to analyze the data, with the findings suggesting that the NGSLT may be less a measure of students’ knowledge of the target words than a measure of how well they can understand the answer choices.","PeriodicalId":138095,"journal":{"name":"Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The New General Service List Test (NGSLT) (Stoeckel & Bennett, 2015) was designed as a diagnostic test to measure students’ written receptive vocabulary knowledge. This test battery was developed based upon the New General Service List (NGSL) (Browne, 2013), which makes it appealing to teachers in Japan, and especially those who see vocabulary as key to English as a foreign or second language learning. The research focused on finding out whether and to what degree the test accurately and reliably measures students’ vocabulary knowledge, and to find if there are any incongruences with the scores on this test and those on extraneous standards. Three versions of the NGSLT were distributed and a triangulation method was used to analyze the data, with the findings suggesting that the NGSLT may be less a measure of students’ knowledge of the target words than a measure of how well they can understand the answer choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为了更好地评价日本大学生的书面接受性词汇水平,对新通用事务表测验(NGSLT)的信度进行检验
新通用服务表测试(New General Service List Test, NGSLT) (Stoeckel & Bennett, 2015)是一项用于测量学生书面接受性词汇知识的诊断性测试。这个测试单元是基于新通用服务列表(NGSL) (Browne, 2013)开发的,这使得它对日本的教师很有吸引力,特别是那些将词汇视为英语作为外语或第二语言学习的关键的教师。本研究的重点是考察该测试是否准确、可靠地测量了学生的词汇知识,以及在多大程度上准确、可靠地测量了学生的词汇知识,并发现该测试的分数与其他标准的分数是否存在不一致之处。我们分发了三个版本的NGSLT,并使用三角测量法对数据进行了分析,结果表明,NGSLT与其说是衡量学生对目标单词的了解程度,不如说是衡量他们对答案选择的理解程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating #FLIrish101 in an LMOOC – learner engagement and pedagogical approach Learning L2 pronunciation with a text-to-speech synthesizer Tracking and analysing the learner behaviour of non- and low-literate adults in an online literacy training environment Automatic scaffolding for L2 listeners by leveraging natural language processing Exploring foreign language anxiety and self-disclosure relationships in task design for e-tandem speaking practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1