Multiple face detection based on machine learning

Hajar Filali, J. Riffi, A. M. Mahraz, H. Tairi
{"title":"Multiple face detection based on machine learning","authors":"Hajar Filali, J. Riffi, A. M. Mahraz, H. Tairi","doi":"10.1109/ISACV.2018.8354058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facial detection has recently attracted increasing interest due to the multitude of applications that result from it. In this context, we have used methods based on machine learning that allows a machine to evolve through a learning process, and to perform tasks that are difficult or impossible to fill by more conventional algorithmic means. According to this context, we have established a comparative study between four methods (Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost, GF-SVM, GF-NN). These techniques vary according to the way in which they extract the data and the adopted learning algorithms. The first two methods “Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost” are based on the Boosting algorithm, which is used both for selection and for learning a strong classifier with a cascade classification. While the last two classification methods “GF-SVM, GF-NN” use the Gabor filter to extract the characteristics. From this study, we found that the detection time varies from one method to another. Indeed, the LBP-AdaBoost and Haar-AdaBoost methods are the fastest compared to others. But in terms of detection rate and false detection rate, the Haar-AdaBoost method remains the best of the four methods.","PeriodicalId":184662,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISACV.2018.8354058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Facial detection has recently attracted increasing interest due to the multitude of applications that result from it. In this context, we have used methods based on machine learning that allows a machine to evolve through a learning process, and to perform tasks that are difficult or impossible to fill by more conventional algorithmic means. According to this context, we have established a comparative study between four methods (Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost, GF-SVM, GF-NN). These techniques vary according to the way in which they extract the data and the adopted learning algorithms. The first two methods “Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost” are based on the Boosting algorithm, which is used both for selection and for learning a strong classifier with a cascade classification. While the last two classification methods “GF-SVM, GF-NN” use the Gabor filter to extract the characteristics. From this study, we found that the detection time varies from one method to another. Indeed, the LBP-AdaBoost and Haar-AdaBoost methods are the fastest compared to others. But in terms of detection rate and false detection rate, the Haar-AdaBoost method remains the best of the four methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的多人脸检测
由于大量的应用,面部检测最近引起了越来越多的兴趣。在这种情况下,我们使用了基于机器学习的方法,允许机器通过学习过程进化,并执行难以或不可能通过更传统的算法手段完成的任务。在此背景下,我们建立了四种方法(Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost, GF-SVM, GF-NN)的比较研究。这些技术根据提取数据的方式和采用的学习算法而有所不同。前两种方法“Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost”是基于Boosting算法的,该算法既用于选择,也用于学习具有级联分类的强分类器。而后两种分类方法“GF-SVM、GF-NN”使用Gabor滤波器提取特征。从本研究中,我们发现不同方法的检测时间不同。事实上,LBP-AdaBoost和Haar-AdaBoost方法是最快的。但在检出率和误检率方面,Haar-AdaBoost方法仍然是四种方法中最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy based generic autonomic adapter for a context-aware social-collaborative system Dual-camera 3D head tracking for clinical infant monitoring Integrating web usage mining for an automatic learner profile detection: A learning styles-based approach Deep generative models: Survey Deep neural network dynamic traffic routing system for vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1