How Online Forums Complement Task Documentation in Software Crowdsourcing

L. Machado, Igor Steinmacher, S. Marczak, C. D. Souza
{"title":"How Online Forums Complement Task Documentation in Software Crowdsourcing","authors":"L. Machado, Igor Steinmacher, S. Marczak, C. D. Souza","doi":"10.1145/3387940.3391497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An issue in software crowdsourcing is the quality of the task documentation and the high number of registered crowd workers to solve tasks but few submitted solutions only. This happens because uncommunicated or misunderstood requirements can lead crowd workers to deliver a solution that does not meet the customers' requirements or, worse, to give up submitting a solution. In this paper, we present an empirical study in which we analyzed task documentation and online forums messages associated with 25 Software Crowdsourcing (SW CS) challenges. The findings corroborate that weak documentation is a challenge in SW CS. Meanwhile, online forums allow crowd workers to gather additional technical and operational information that is not present in the official task documentation. We provide a stepping stone towards understanding the interplay between requirements and communication, to make it possible to improve SW CS development processes, practices, and tools.","PeriodicalId":309659,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3391497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An issue in software crowdsourcing is the quality of the task documentation and the high number of registered crowd workers to solve tasks but few submitted solutions only. This happens because uncommunicated or misunderstood requirements can lead crowd workers to deliver a solution that does not meet the customers' requirements or, worse, to give up submitting a solution. In this paper, we present an empirical study in which we analyzed task documentation and online forums messages associated with 25 Software Crowdsourcing (SW CS) challenges. The findings corroborate that weak documentation is a challenge in SW CS. Meanwhile, online forums allow crowd workers to gather additional technical and operational information that is not present in the official task documentation. We provide a stepping stone towards understanding the interplay between requirements and communication, to make it possible to improve SW CS development processes, practices, and tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线论坛如何补充软件众包中的任务文档
软件众包的一个问题是任务文档的质量和大量注册的众包工作者解决任务,但很少提交解决方案。这是因为未沟通或误解的需求可能导致群体工作人员交付不符合客户需求的解决方案,或者更糟的是,放弃提交解决方案。在本文中,我们提出了一项实证研究,其中我们分析了与25个软件众包(SW CS)挑战相关的任务文档和在线论坛消息。研究结果证实,弱文档是SW CS的一个挑战。同时,在线论坛允许群众工作者收集官方任务文档中没有的额外技术和操作信息。我们为理解需求和沟通之间的相互作用提供了一个垫脚石,使改进SW CS开发过程、实践和工具成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Systematic Mapping on Software Engineering for Robotic Systems: A Software Quality Perspective Generating API Test Data Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Human Factors in the Study of Automatic Software Repair: Future Directions for Research with Industry Strategies for Crowdworkers to Overcome Barriers in Competition-based Software Crowdsourcing Development Centralized Generic Interfaces in Hardware/Software Co-design for AI Accelerators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1