Proposed alternative test procedure for AAR specification M-965-91 with the vibration test unit

D.L. Cackovic, R.L. Bollock
{"title":"Proposed alternative test procedure for AAR specification M-965-91 with the vibration test unit","authors":"D.L. Cackovic, R.L. Bollock","doi":"10.1109/RRCON.1994.289014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An investigation into a possible alternative test procedure for the Association of American Railroads' (AAR) Specification M-965-91, sponsored by the Standard Car Truck Company, was performed on the Vibration Test Unit (VTU) in the Rail Dynamics Laboratory at the Transportation Test Center (TTC), Pueblo, Colorado. The results show that the VTU was able to excite responses of the test car which, when compared to on-track test data, showed similarities in characteristics (i.e. critical speed was clearly evident in both cases) but not in regards to absolute values of response amplitudes and critical speeds. The referenced specification, \"Special Devices to Control Stability of Freight Cars,\" originally involved the testing of trucks for roll stability on a car rocker located at Norfolk Southern's research and test facility in Alexandria, Virginia. When that rocker was no longer available, the specification was amended to allow certification to be achieved through tests over a track which contains 0.75-inch cross level variations designed to determine roll behavior. The modified certification procedure required the test car to traverse the twist-and-roll track section at constant speed, increasing in 1 mph increments from 12 mph to 25 mph. Criteria for the revised certification procedure required lateral to vertical wheel force ratios (L/V) to be less than 1.4, roll angles to be less than 6 degrees peak-to-peak, and minimum vertical wheel loads not to be less than 25 percent of static value through the wheels and axles.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":145407,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RRCON.1994.289014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

An investigation into a possible alternative test procedure for the Association of American Railroads' (AAR) Specification M-965-91, sponsored by the Standard Car Truck Company, was performed on the Vibration Test Unit (VTU) in the Rail Dynamics Laboratory at the Transportation Test Center (TTC), Pueblo, Colorado. The results show that the VTU was able to excite responses of the test car which, when compared to on-track test data, showed similarities in characteristics (i.e. critical speed was clearly evident in both cases) but not in regards to absolute values of response amplitudes and critical speeds. The referenced specification, "Special Devices to Control Stability of Freight Cars," originally involved the testing of trucks for roll stability on a car rocker located at Norfolk Southern's research and test facility in Alexandria, Virginia. When that rocker was no longer available, the specification was amended to allow certification to be achieved through tests over a track which contains 0.75-inch cross level variations designed to determine roll behavior. The modified certification procedure required the test car to traverse the twist-and-roll track section at constant speed, increasing in 1 mph increments from 12 mph to 25 mph. Criteria for the revised certification procedure required lateral to vertical wheel force ratios (L/V) to be less than 1.4, roll angles to be less than 6 degrees peak-to-peak, and minimum vertical wheel loads not to be less than 25 percent of static value through the wheels and axles.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对AAR规范M-965-91的振动试验装置提出了替代试验程序
一项针对美国铁路协会(AAR)规范M-965-91的可能替代测试程序的调查,由标准汽车卡车公司赞助,在位于科罗拉多州普韦布洛的运输测试中心(TTC)的轨道动力学实验室的振动测试单元(VTU)上进行。结果表明,VTU能够激发测试车的响应,与轨道测试数据相比,在特性上(即临界速度在两种情况下都很明显)显示出相似性,但在响应幅度和临界速度的绝对值方面则不同。参考规范“控制货车稳定性的特殊装置”最初涉及在位于弗吉尼亚州亚历山大的诺福克南方研究和测试设施的汽车摇臂上测试卡车的侧倾稳定性。当该摇杆不再可用时,规范进行了修改,允许通过在包含0.75英寸横向水平变化的轨道上进行测试来实现认证,以确定滚动行为。修改后的认证程序要求测试车以恒定速度通过扭曲和滚动的轨道部分,从12英里/小时增加到25英里/小时,每小时增加1英里/小时。修订后的认证程序标准要求横向与垂直车轮力比(L/V)小于1.4,横滚角峰对峰小于6度,最小垂直车轮载荷不小于通过车轮和车轴的静态值的25%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of wheel and rail profiles on gage widening behavior Joint development research and technology transfer for AC traction drives Does a critical speed for railroad vehicles exist? DC railway power network solutions by diakoptics Dallas Area Rapid Transit light rail vehicle/spl minus/ modern equipment with a modern appearance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1