A New Framework to Assess the Individual Fairness of Probabilistic Classifiers

M. F. A. Khan, Hamid Karimi
{"title":"A New Framework to Assess the Individual Fairness of Probabilistic Classifiers","authors":"M. F. A. Khan, Hamid Karimi","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fairness in machine learning has become a global concern due to the predominance of ML in automated decision-making systems. In comparison to group fairness, individual fairness, which aspires that similar individuals should be treated similarly, has received limited attention due to some challenges. One major challenge is the availability of a proper metric to evaluate individual fairness, especially for probabilistic classifiers. In this study, we propose a framework PCIndFair to assess the individual fairness of probabilistic classifiers. Unlike current individual fairness measures, our framework considers probability distribution rather than the final classification outcome, which is suitable for capturing the dynamic of probabilistic classifiers, e.g., neural networks. We perform extensive experiments on four standard datasets and discuss the practical benefits of the framework. This study can be helpful for machine learning researchers and practitioners flexibly assess their models' individual fairness. The complete code of the framework is publicly available1.","PeriodicalId":128160,"journal":{"name":"2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fairness in machine learning has become a global concern due to the predominance of ML in automated decision-making systems. In comparison to group fairness, individual fairness, which aspires that similar individuals should be treated similarly, has received limited attention due to some challenges. One major challenge is the availability of a proper metric to evaluate individual fairness, especially for probabilistic classifiers. In this study, we propose a framework PCIndFair to assess the individual fairness of probabilistic classifiers. Unlike current individual fairness measures, our framework considers probability distribution rather than the final classification outcome, which is suitable for capturing the dynamic of probabilistic classifiers, e.g., neural networks. We perform extensive experiments on four standard datasets and discuss the practical benefits of the framework. This study can be helpful for machine learning researchers and practitioners flexibly assess their models' individual fairness. The complete code of the framework is publicly available1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评估概率分类器个体公平性的新框架
由于机器学习在自动化决策系统中的主导地位,机器学习中的公平性已经成为全球关注的问题。与群体公平相比,个体公平由于受到一些挑战而受到的关注有限。个体公平要求相似的个体应该得到相似的对待。一个主要的挑战是评估个体公平性的适当度量的可用性,特别是对于概率分类器。在本研究中,我们提出了一个框架PCIndFair来评估概率分类器的个体公平性。与当前的个体公平度量不同,我们的框架考虑概率分布而不是最终分类结果,这适用于捕获概率分类器(例如神经网络)的动态。我们在四个标准数据集上进行了广泛的实验,并讨论了该框架的实际好处。本研究可以帮助机器学习研究者和实践者灵活地评估其模型的个体公平性。该框架的完整代码是公开的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approximate Orthogonal Spectral Autoencoders for Community Analysis in Social Networks DeepReject and DeepRoad: Road Condition Recognition and Classification Under Adversarial Conditions Improving Aquaculture Systems using AI: Employing predictive models for Biomass Estimation on Sonar Images ICDARTS: Improving the Stability of Cyclic DARTS Symbolic Semantic Memory in Transformer Language Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1