Corporate-NGO partnerships and the regulatory impact of the Energy and Biodiversity Initiative

S. Tully
{"title":"Corporate-NGO partnerships and the regulatory impact of the Energy and Biodiversity Initiative","authors":"S. Tully","doi":"10.1163/1571807042341746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporations react to the regulatory drivers instituted by government and to a lesser extent the private initiatives of non-governmental organisations (NGOs). In contrast to the adversarial model, firms and NGOs may form partnerships for the satisfaction of mutual objectives such as influencing the development of public policy or reforming international legal regimes. This article considers one such partnership – the Energy and Biodiversity Initiative – within the regulatory context of conserving biological diversity and protecting heritage-listed or environmentally-sensitive areas. Four firms and five NGOs jointly formulated operational guidelines for integrating biodiversity considerations into upstream oil and gas development including where commercial projects are located within or adjacent to protected areas. They each contributed biodiversity data, knowledge of environmental management systems, project management skills and information concerning best commercial practice. As demonstrated at the recent Fifth World Parks Congress in South Africa, their efforts were reflected in the adoption of intergovernmental guidelines which envisage further partnerships between governments, firms, civil society and indigenous communities. Illustrative of constructive feedback loops between the public and private spheres within the international lawmaking process, firms and NGOs have secured influential roles in applying and reforming the protected area management system of the World Conservation Union. The EBI is assessed for the lessons it offers for prospective corporate-NGO partnerships, its success in establishing dialogue and trust between the business and conservation communities on controversial questions such as mining in protected areas and as a possible model for private protected area governance.","PeriodicalId":399071,"journal":{"name":"Non-state Actors and International Law","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-state Actors and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1571807042341746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Corporations react to the regulatory drivers instituted by government and to a lesser extent the private initiatives of non-governmental organisations (NGOs). In contrast to the adversarial model, firms and NGOs may form partnerships for the satisfaction of mutual objectives such as influencing the development of public policy or reforming international legal regimes. This article considers one such partnership – the Energy and Biodiversity Initiative – within the regulatory context of conserving biological diversity and protecting heritage-listed or environmentally-sensitive areas. Four firms and five NGOs jointly formulated operational guidelines for integrating biodiversity considerations into upstream oil and gas development including where commercial projects are located within or adjacent to protected areas. They each contributed biodiversity data, knowledge of environmental management systems, project management skills and information concerning best commercial practice. As demonstrated at the recent Fifth World Parks Congress in South Africa, their efforts were reflected in the adoption of intergovernmental guidelines which envisage further partnerships between governments, firms, civil society and indigenous communities. Illustrative of constructive feedback loops between the public and private spheres within the international lawmaking process, firms and NGOs have secured influential roles in applying and reforming the protected area management system of the World Conservation Union. The EBI is assessed for the lessons it offers for prospective corporate-NGO partnerships, its success in establishing dialogue and trust between the business and conservation communities on controversial questions such as mining in protected areas and as a possible model for private protected area governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业与非政府组织的伙伴关系以及能源与生物多样性倡议的监管影响
公司对政府制定的监管驱动因素作出反应,在较小程度上对非政府组织(ngo)的私人倡议作出反应。与对抗模式相反,企业和非政府组织可能结成伙伴关系,以实现诸如影响公共政策的制定或改革国际法律制度等共同目标。本文考虑了一个这样的伙伴关系——能源和生物多样性倡议——在保护生物多样性和保护遗产名录或环境敏感地区的监管背景下。四家公司和五家非政府组织联合制定了将生物多样性考虑纳入上游石油和天然气开发的操作指南,包括商业项目位于保护区内或附近的地方。他们各自提供了生物多样性数据、环境管理系统知识、项目管理技能和有关最佳商业实践的信息。正如最近在南非举行的第五届世界公园大会所表明的那样,他们的努力反映在通过了政府间准则,其中设想政府、公司、民间社会和土著社区之间进一步的伙伴关系。公司和非政府组织在应用和改革世界自然保护联盟的保护区管理制度方面发挥了有影响力的作用,说明了国际立法过程中公共和私人领域之间建设性的反馈循环。评估EBI的依据是,它为未来的企业与非政府组织合作提供了经验教训,它成功地在企业与保护团体之间建立了对话和信任,解决了在保护区采矿等有争议的问题,并可能成为私人保护区治理的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Privatization of Human Rights Violations – Business' Impunity or Corporate Responsibility? The Case of Human Rights Abuses and Torture in Iraq The application of customary international law by national courts: Introduction UK immigration law under attack and the direct application of article 8 ECHR by the ECJ Institutionalization of Cooperation Between Inter-Governmental Organisations and NGOs: The BSEC Experience Multinational enterprises: international codes and the challenge of `sustainable development'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1