A Continuous Collision Checking Method for Non-holonomic Path Planning in Narrow Environments

Daniel Henning, Georg Schildbach
{"title":"A Continuous Collision Checking Method for Non-holonomic Path Planning in Narrow Environments","authors":"Daniel Henning, Georg Schildbach","doi":"10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new method of collision checking for non-holonomic dynamical systems in environments with narrow passages. This new method is compared with alternative approaches for collision checking, which are widely used in conjunction with different path planners. All methods are evaluated in a systematic simulation study with numerous scenarios, using two of the most popular path planning methods, Hybrid A* and RRT*. On the one hand, the results show that the new collision checking approach can manage the narrow passages better than the compared methods. On the other hand, its computation time can be longer or shorter, depending on the particular scenario.","PeriodicalId":220845,"journal":{"name":"2022 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a new method of collision checking for non-holonomic dynamical systems in environments with narrow passages. This new method is compared with alternative approaches for collision checking, which are widely used in conjunction with different path planners. All methods are evaluated in a systematic simulation study with numerous scenarios, using two of the most popular path planning methods, Hybrid A* and RRT*. On the one hand, the results show that the new collision checking approach can manage the narrow passages better than the compared methods. On the other hand, its computation time can be longer or shorter, depending on the particular scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窄环境下非完整路径规划的连续碰撞检测方法
本文提出了窄通道环境下非完整动力系统碰撞检测的一种新方法。该方法与其他碰撞检测方法进行了比较,这些方法通常与不同的路径规划器结合使用。采用两种最流行的路径规划方法Hybrid a *和RRT*,在系统仿真研究中对所有方法进行了评估。结果表明,该碰撞检测方法能较好地处理窄通道。另一方面,它的计算时间可能更长或更短,这取决于特定的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance analysis of 5G communication based on distance evaluation using the SIM8200EA-M2 module Using 3D Scanning Techniques from Robotic Applications in the Constructions Domain Chen-Fliess Series for Linear Distributed Systems with One Spatial Dimension Component generator for the development of RESTful APIs Sensitivity-Based Iterative State-Feedback Tuning for Nonlinear Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1