“Learning Outcome” as a Theological Concept

C. Marsh
{"title":"“Learning Outcome” as a Theological Concept","authors":"C. Marsh","doi":"10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the purpose and effectiveness of “learning outcomes” within theological education in the face of charges that they primarily serve the needs of managers and bureaucrats rather than educators. Drawing on theories about outcomes and recent evidence-based reflections on their usefulness for students, the paper argues that they are indeed pedagogically beneficial. They can be of particular use in theological education when viewed within the overall context within which such education occurs i.e. the development of the whole person. It is, however, essential that the limitations of what learning outcomes can achieve is also recognized, acknowledging that much more can, and is likely to, be learned in programmes than outcomes at session, module or course level can possibly encapsulate.","PeriodicalId":224329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the purpose and effectiveness of “learning outcomes” within theological education in the face of charges that they primarily serve the needs of managers and bureaucrats rather than educators. Drawing on theories about outcomes and recent evidence-based reflections on their usefulness for students, the paper argues that they are indeed pedagogically beneficial. They can be of particular use in theological education when viewed within the overall context within which such education occurs i.e. the development of the whole person. It is, however, essential that the limitations of what learning outcomes can achieve is also recognized, acknowledging that much more can, and is likely to, be learned in programmes than outcomes at session, module or course level can possibly encapsulate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为神学概念的“学习成果”
本文探讨了神学教育中“学习成果”的目的和有效性,因为人们指责神学教育主要服务于管理者和官僚的需要,而不是教育工作者的需要。根据关于结果的理论和最近对其对学生有用性的基于证据的反思,论文认为它们确实在教学上有益。在神学教育的整体背景下,即在整个人的发展中,它们可以特别用于神学教育。然而,至关重要的是,我们也要认识到学习成果所能达到的局限性,认识到在课程中可以而且很可能学到的东西,比在会议、模块或课程层面上的成果可能包含的要多得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Threshold of Conscience: A Radical Challenge for Education in Theological Ethics … and Beyond ‘Dissolving Boundaries’ – An Analysis of Threshold Concepts Within Disability Theology Cognition or Spiritual Disposition? Threshold Concepts in Theological Reflection† ‘Tell Me the Landscapes in Which You Live and I Will Tell You Who You Are’ – Online Theology Students Crossing Thresholds in Religious Education and Spirituality Against an Australian Desert Context A Response: Threshold Concepts in Religious Education and Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1