{"title":"A New Approach for Rock Typing Using Dimensional Analysis: A Case Study of Carbonate Reservoir","authors":"M. Abdullah, A. Garrouch","doi":"10.2118/198026-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, Petrophysicists have established that rock typing is an essential pre-requisite for estimating permeability in reservoir rocks. Any attempt that does not use rock typing for modeling permeability has been documented to be characterized by a large data scatter and associated with high uncertainty.\n In this paper, four common rock typing techniques are compared: Pittman, Lucia, Flow Zone Indicator (FZI), and Global Hydraulic Element (GHE). The performance of these rock typing approaches is assessed through intrinsic models for their ability to predict the permeability of a prominent carbonate field. The FZI and the Pittman approaches gave the best estimates of permeability with a coefficient of determination of approximately 0.98. By contrast, the Lucia approach gave the least precise estimates of permeability with a coefficient of determination of 0.81. The GHE approach gave a satisfactory estimation with a coefficient of determination of 0.90.\n A new technique for rock typing, based on dimensional analysis, is presented. Dimensional analysis leads to the derivation of two dimensionless groups: (λ) and (Ω). The λ group is a dimensionless Flow Zone Indicator (FZI) and the (Ω) group is the dimensionless photo-electric adsorption. The main advantage of the dimensional analysis technique is that it relies directly on open hole log measurements, such as the spontaneous potential, bulk density, interval transit time, and photoelectric absorption. A unique power-law relationship exists between the dimensionless FZI group (λ), and the dimensionless photo-electric adsorption group (Ω). For the studied carbonate field, a coefficient of determination of 0.98 was obtained when estimating reservoir permeability with the dimensional analysis rock typing.\n This paper will be of interest to subsurface modelers who need to estimate permeability. Using the dimensional analysis approach described and comparing this new method of estimation with established methods, it is proposed that rock typing by dimensional analysis for estimating permeability can be used as an alternative method.","PeriodicalId":282370,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, October 14, 2019","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, October 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198026-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In recent years, Petrophysicists have established that rock typing is an essential pre-requisite for estimating permeability in reservoir rocks. Any attempt that does not use rock typing for modeling permeability has been documented to be characterized by a large data scatter and associated with high uncertainty.
In this paper, four common rock typing techniques are compared: Pittman, Lucia, Flow Zone Indicator (FZI), and Global Hydraulic Element (GHE). The performance of these rock typing approaches is assessed through intrinsic models for their ability to predict the permeability of a prominent carbonate field. The FZI and the Pittman approaches gave the best estimates of permeability with a coefficient of determination of approximately 0.98. By contrast, the Lucia approach gave the least precise estimates of permeability with a coefficient of determination of 0.81. The GHE approach gave a satisfactory estimation with a coefficient of determination of 0.90.
A new technique for rock typing, based on dimensional analysis, is presented. Dimensional analysis leads to the derivation of two dimensionless groups: (λ) and (Ω). The λ group is a dimensionless Flow Zone Indicator (FZI) and the (Ω) group is the dimensionless photo-electric adsorption. The main advantage of the dimensional analysis technique is that it relies directly on open hole log measurements, such as the spontaneous potential, bulk density, interval transit time, and photoelectric absorption. A unique power-law relationship exists between the dimensionless FZI group (λ), and the dimensionless photo-electric adsorption group (Ω). For the studied carbonate field, a coefficient of determination of 0.98 was obtained when estimating reservoir permeability with the dimensional analysis rock typing.
This paper will be of interest to subsurface modelers who need to estimate permeability. Using the dimensional analysis approach described and comparing this new method of estimation with established methods, it is proposed that rock typing by dimensional analysis for estimating permeability can be used as an alternative method.
近年来,岩石物理学家已经确定岩石类型是估计储层岩石渗透率的必要先决条件。任何不使用岩石分型来模拟渗透率的尝试都被证明具有大数据分散和高不确定性的特点。本文比较了Pittman、Lucia、Flow Zone Indicator (FZI)和Global Hydraulic Element (GHE)四种常用的岩石分型技术。这些岩石分型方法的性能是通过内在模型来评估的,因为它们能够预测一个突出的碳酸盐岩油田的渗透率。FZI和Pittman方法给出了渗透率的最佳估计,其决定系数约为0.98。相比之下,Lucia方法给出的渗透率估计最不精确,其决定系数为0.81。GHE法给出了令人满意的估计,决定系数为0.90。提出了一种基于量纲分析的岩石分型新方法。量纲分析导致两个无量纲群的推导:(λ)和(Ω)。λ基团为无量纲流动区指示器(FZI), (Ω)基团为无量纲光电吸附。量程分析技术的主要优点是,它直接依赖于裸眼测井测量,如自发电位、体积密度、层间传递时间和光电吸收。无因次FZI基团(λ)与无因次光电吸附基团(Ω)之间存在独特的幂律关系。对于研究的碳酸盐岩油田,用量纲分析岩石分型估计储层渗透率的决定系数为0.98。对于需要估计渗透率的地下建模人员来说,这篇论文将会很有意义。利用所描述的量纲分析方法,并将这种新的估计方法与已有的方法进行比较,提出用量纲分析岩石分型来估计渗透率可以作为一种替代方法。