How can employers benefit most from developmental job experiences? The needs-supplies fit perspective.

Jie Cao, Monika Hamori
{"title":"How can employers benefit most from developmental job experiences? The needs-supplies fit perspective.","authors":"Jie Cao, Monika Hamori","doi":"10.1037/apl0000449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While previous empirical research showed that developmental job experiences (DJE) lead to positive work-related outcomes, recent studies have also pointed out their downsides. With an aim to reconcile these findings, this study explores how the fit between personal needs and organizational supplies of DJE influences affective organizational commitment and voluntary turnover, and the moderating role of career identity salience. Multiwave and multisource data on Chinese employees indicate that affective organizational commitment was higher as needs of DJE matched supplies and lower in the case of a mismatch. Affective organizational commitment was higher when needs and supplies were both high than when both were low. These relationships were stronger when career identity salience was high. Furthermore, the relationship between needs-supplies fit and voluntary turnover was mediated by affective organizational commitment. These findings imply that rather than providing universally high levels of DJE, employers should match these experiences to employees' needs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":169654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

While previous empirical research showed that developmental job experiences (DJE) lead to positive work-related outcomes, recent studies have also pointed out their downsides. With an aim to reconcile these findings, this study explores how the fit between personal needs and organizational supplies of DJE influences affective organizational commitment and voluntary turnover, and the moderating role of career identity salience. Multiwave and multisource data on Chinese employees indicate that affective organizational commitment was higher as needs of DJE matched supplies and lower in the case of a mismatch. Affective organizational commitment was higher when needs and supplies were both high than when both were low. These relationships were stronger when career identity salience was high. Furthermore, the relationship between needs-supplies fit and voluntary turnover was mediated by affective organizational commitment. These findings imply that rather than providing universally high levels of DJE, employers should match these experiences to employees' needs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雇主如何从发展工作经验中获益最多?需求-供给契合的观点。
虽然之前的实证研究表明,发展性工作经历(DJE)会带来积极的工作成果,但最近的研究也指出了它们的缺点。本研究探讨了个人需求与组织供给的契合度对员工情感组织承诺和自愿离职的影响,以及职业认同显著性的调节作用。对中国员工的多波多源数据表明,当DJE需求匹配时,情感组织承诺更高,当DJE需求不匹配时,情感组织承诺更低。当需求和供给都高时,情感组织承诺高于需求和供给都低时。当职业认同显著性高时,这些关系更强。此外,情感组织承诺在需求-供给契合度与自愿离职之间起中介作用。这些发现表明,雇主不应该提供普遍的高水平DJE,而应该将这些体验与员工的需求相匹配。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The benefits of reflecting on gratitude received at home for leaders at work: Insights from three field experiments. Personality and leadership: Meta-analytic review of cross-cultural moderation, behavioral mediation, and honesty-humility. Newcomers building social capital by proactive networking: A signaling perspective. Supportive, resistant, or both? A person-centric view on employee responses to diversity initiatives. A regulatory focus theory perspective on the dynamics between action and power.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1