Comparative evaluation of two surgical techniques using conventional scalpel method and diode laser for treatment outcome of depigmentation: 6 months follow-up study

N. Rajesh, G. Sagar, T. S. S. Kumar, KKrishna Moha Reddy, BShiva Shankar, V. Sandeep
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of two surgical techniques using conventional scalpel method and diode laser for treatment outcome of depigmentation: 6 months follow-up study","authors":"N. Rajesh, G. Sagar, T. S. S. Kumar, KKrishna Moha Reddy, BShiva Shankar, V. Sandeep","doi":"10.4103/0976-2868.184600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Various surgical techniques can be done for depigmentation but recurrence is the limiting factor for many surgical procedures, and the aim of the present study was to evaluate quantitatively the rate of repigmentation postoperatively after using scalpel and diode lasers for depigmentation. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 systemically healthy patients of 18 males and two females, within the age group of 18-40 years with an esthetic complaint of hyperpigmented gingiva were enrolled in this study. The patients were briefed about the surgical procedure and obtained the informed consent; they were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: 10 patients - depigmentation with scalpel technique. Group B: 10 patients - depigmentation with diode lasers (Biolase; ) and followed for 6 months. Results: The results of this study had shown that there is a statistically significant difference in the pre- and post-operative values in scalpel surgical technique with a (P = 0.005), and there is no statistically significant (P = 0.20) difference in the diode laser technique. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon Signed rank test and Mann-Whitney test. Conclusion: By using diode lasers, the rate of repigmentation is higher than scalpel method; however, it has been documented that there is minimal postoperative bleeding, pain, wound healing, discomfort, and ease of the procedure with diode laser and finally, each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.","PeriodicalId":345720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Lasers","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-2868.184600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Various surgical techniques can be done for depigmentation but recurrence is the limiting factor for many surgical procedures, and the aim of the present study was to evaluate quantitatively the rate of repigmentation postoperatively after using scalpel and diode lasers for depigmentation. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 systemically healthy patients of 18 males and two females, within the age group of 18-40 years with an esthetic complaint of hyperpigmented gingiva were enrolled in this study. The patients were briefed about the surgical procedure and obtained the informed consent; they were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: 10 patients - depigmentation with scalpel technique. Group B: 10 patients - depigmentation with diode lasers (Biolase; ) and followed for 6 months. Results: The results of this study had shown that there is a statistically significant difference in the pre- and post-operative values in scalpel surgical technique with a (P = 0.005), and there is no statistically significant (P = 0.20) difference in the diode laser technique. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon Signed rank test and Mann-Whitney test. Conclusion: By using diode lasers, the rate of repigmentation is higher than scalpel method; however, it has been documented that there is minimal postoperative bleeding, pain, wound healing, discomfort, and ease of the procedure with diode laser and finally, each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统手术刀法与二极管激光两种手术方法治疗色素沉着的疗效比较:6个月随访研究
背景:各种手术技术可用于脱色,但复发是许多手术的限制因素,本研究的目的是定量评估手术后使用手术刀和二极管激光脱色后的再色素沉着率。材料与方法:选取年龄在18-40岁,以牙龈色素沉着为审美主因的全身健康患者20例,男18例,女2例。向患者简要介绍手术过程并取得患者的知情同意;他们被随机分成两组。A组:10例患者-手术刀技术脱色。B组:10例患者采用二极管激光(Biolase;)脱色,随访6个月。结果:本研究结果显示,手术刀技术的术前、术后数值差异有统计学意义(P = 0.005),而二极管激光技术的术前、术后数值差异无统计学意义(P = 0.20)。统计分析采用:Wilcoxon sign rank检验和Mann-Whitney检验。结论:二极管激光法比手术刀法恢复色素沉着率高;然而,有文献记载,二极管激光手术术后出血、疼痛、伤口愈合、不适最小,而且手术容易,最后,每种技术都有自己的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diode laser excision of pyogenic granuloma: A case report Fluid flow analysis of laser-activated irrigation in the simulated root canal Evaluation of the efficacy of Er:YAG laser–activated irrigation in a simulated accessory canal Drug-induced gingival enlargement: A case report Editors message
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1