How Atheist Scientists Approach Meaning and Morality

E. Ecklund, D. Johnson
{"title":"How Atheist Scientists Approach Meaning and Morality","authors":"E. Ecklund, D. Johnson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197539163.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter we ask how atheist scientists think about meaning and purpose. Some observers assume that morality requires religion, while others distrust atheists and believe they are morally depraved. We find that most atheist scientists believe that life has no inherent meaning, while others believe that questions of meaning cannot be answered. Many atheist scientists posit that science motivates purpose through continual improvements to our understanding and interaction with the world around us. In contrast to those who assert atheists are immoral, survey data suggests that religious and nonreligious scientists are no different in terms of their commitment to moral values.","PeriodicalId":357536,"journal":{"name":"Varieties of Atheism in Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varieties of Atheism in Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197539163.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter we ask how atheist scientists think about meaning and purpose. Some observers assume that morality requires religion, while others distrust atheists and believe they are morally depraved. We find that most atheist scientists believe that life has no inherent meaning, while others believe that questions of meaning cannot be answered. Many atheist scientists posit that science motivates purpose through continual improvements to our understanding and interaction with the world around us. In contrast to those who assert atheists are immoral, survey data suggests that religious and nonreligious scientists are no different in terms of their commitment to moral values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无神论科学家如何看待意义和道德
在本章中,我们将探讨无神论科学家如何看待意义和目的。一些观察家认为道德需要宗教,而另一些人则不信任无神论者,认为他们道德败坏。我们发现,大多数无神论科学家认为生命没有内在意义,而另一些人则认为意义问题无法回答。许多无神论科学家认为,科学通过不断提高我们对周围世界的理解和互动来激发目标。与那些断言无神论者不道德的人相反,调查数据表明,宗教和非宗教科学家在对道德价值观的承诺方面没有什么不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“I Am Not Like Richard” What Atheist Scientists Think about Science “Tried and Found Wanting” Spiritual Atheist Scientists From Rhetoric to Reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1