Classification of Mental Workload (MWL) using Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)

Umer Asgher, Khurram Khalil, Y. Ayaz, Riaz Ahmad, Muhammad Jawad Khan
{"title":"Classification of Mental Workload (MWL) using Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)","authors":"Umer Asgher, Khurram Khalil, Y. Ayaz, Riaz Ahmad, Muhammad Jawad Khan","doi":"10.1109/iCoMET48670.2020.9073799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current era of technological advancements and rising human-machine interaction, urged the vital importance of human factors and ergonomics in an industrial collaborative environment. These ergonomic needs have made it essential to analyze the industrial cognitive processes like mental workload (MWL), stress and vigilance in the ecological environment. Conventionally Electroencephalography (EEG) was used for assessment of brain electrical activity but recently functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) has immerged as a better substitute for acquiring brain signals with fewer protocols and enhanced spatial resolution. Over the period of time Machine learning algorithms (LDA, k-NN, ANN) are used to classify MWL and affiliated brain functions. Now the trend of employing Deep learning techniques is gaining popularity. In this study, we analyzed and classified MWL states using Machine learning (SVM) and Deep learning (CNN) algorithms. The classification accuracies achieved with Deep learning (CNN) outperformed the accuracies achieved with Machine learning algorithms. The best accuracies were achieved using CNN that are in the range of 80-87%. Finally, a comparison is drawn between Machine learning and Deep learning algorithms for better classification and discrimination of cognitive loads.","PeriodicalId":431051,"journal":{"name":"2020 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iCoMET48670.2020.9073799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In the current era of technological advancements and rising human-machine interaction, urged the vital importance of human factors and ergonomics in an industrial collaborative environment. These ergonomic needs have made it essential to analyze the industrial cognitive processes like mental workload (MWL), stress and vigilance in the ecological environment. Conventionally Electroencephalography (EEG) was used for assessment of brain electrical activity but recently functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) has immerged as a better substitute for acquiring brain signals with fewer protocols and enhanced spatial resolution. Over the period of time Machine learning algorithms (LDA, k-NN, ANN) are used to classify MWL and affiliated brain functions. Now the trend of employing Deep learning techniques is gaining popularity. In this study, we analyzed and classified MWL states using Machine learning (SVM) and Deep learning (CNN) algorithms. The classification accuracies achieved with Deep learning (CNN) outperformed the accuracies achieved with Machine learning algorithms. The best accuracies were achieved using CNN that are in the range of 80-87%. Finally, a comparison is drawn between Machine learning and Deep learning algorithms for better classification and discrimination of cognitive loads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于支持向量机(SVM)和卷积神经网络(CNN)的心理负荷分类
在当今技术进步和人机交互不断增加的时代,在工业协作环境中,迫切需要人的因素和人体工程学的重要性。这些符合人体工程学的需求使得分析工业认知过程如精神负荷(MWL)、压力和警惕在生态环境中变得必要。传统的脑电图(EEG)被用于评估脑电活动,但最近功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)已成为一种更好的替代方法,以较少的协议和增强的空间分辨率获取脑信号。在一段时间内,机器学习算法(LDA, k-NN, ANN)被用于分类MWL和相关的脑功能。现在,采用深度学习技术的趋势越来越受欢迎。在本研究中,我们使用机器学习(SVM)和深度学习(CNN)算法对MWL状态进行分析和分类。深度学习(CNN)实现的分类精度优于机器学习算法实现的精度。使用CNN获得的最佳准确率在80-87%之间。最后,对机器学习和深度学习算法进行了比较,以更好地对认知负荷进行分类和区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting Faulty Sensors by Analyzing the Uncertain Data Using Probabilistic Database Construction of the Exact Solution of Ripa Model with Primitive Variable Approach A Review on Hybrid Energy Storage Systems in Microgrids Meta-model for Stress Testing on Blockchain Nodes Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Research Challenges and Potential Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1