Formal Validation of Credibility and Accuracy Assessment of Safety Messages in VANETs

Ons Chikhaoui, Aida Ben Chehida Douss, Ryma Abassi, S. Fatmi
{"title":"Formal Validation of Credibility and Accuracy Assessment of Safety Messages in VANETs","authors":"Ons Chikhaoui, Aida Ben Chehida Douss, Ryma Abassi, S. Fatmi","doi":"10.1145/3465481.3470103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs), vehicles exchange safety messages containing valuable information about traffic environment to increase roads’ safety. The critical nature of these messages entails securing them before considering them. In this context, the credibility and the accuracy assessment of these included safety information arises as a necessity since the consumption of false or imprecise ones by vehicles may cause hazardous consequences. To treat this requirement, we proposed the scheme [1] enabling vehicles to evaluate the credibility and the accuracy of the contents of the safety messages exchanged in VANETs. That scheme is based on three modules: a reputation module, a time and location closeness estimation module, and a majority module. A vehicle can use these modules in a separated or joint way according to the circumstances. Since that scheme is error prone, we conducted in [2], a formal validation, using inference system, to prove the soundness and the completeness of these three modules and their combination. In this paper, we complete that formal validation of [1] by handling the junctions of the three basic modules two by two. To do this, we first completed the inference system in [2] so that the junctions of the three modules two by two become incorporated. A formal verification using this holistic inference system was proposed in a second step to prove the soundness and the completeness of these junctions. This verification's obtained results confirmed the validity of the said junctions for being sound and complete.","PeriodicalId":417395,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465481.3470103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs), vehicles exchange safety messages containing valuable information about traffic environment to increase roads’ safety. The critical nature of these messages entails securing them before considering them. In this context, the credibility and the accuracy assessment of these included safety information arises as a necessity since the consumption of false or imprecise ones by vehicles may cause hazardous consequences. To treat this requirement, we proposed the scheme [1] enabling vehicles to evaluate the credibility and the accuracy of the contents of the safety messages exchanged in VANETs. That scheme is based on three modules: a reputation module, a time and location closeness estimation module, and a majority module. A vehicle can use these modules in a separated or joint way according to the circumstances. Since that scheme is error prone, we conducted in [2], a formal validation, using inference system, to prove the soundness and the completeness of these three modules and their combination. In this paper, we complete that formal validation of [1] by handling the junctions of the three basic modules two by two. To do this, we first completed the inference system in [2] so that the junctions of the three modules two by two become incorporated. A formal verification using this holistic inference system was proposed in a second step to prove the soundness and the completeness of these junctions. This verification's obtained results confirmed the validity of the said junctions for being sound and complete.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VANETs安全信息可信度和准确性评估的正式验证
在车辆自组织网络(VANETs)中,车辆交换包含有关交通环境的有价值信息的安全信息,以提高道路安全性。这些消息的关键性质要求在考虑它们之前对它们进行保护。在这方面,必须对这些包括的安全信息进行可信性和准确性评估,因为车辆使用虚假或不精确的信息可能造成危险后果。为了满足这一要求,我们提出了一种方案[1],使车辆能够评估在VANETs中交换的安全信息内容的可信度和准确性。该方案基于三个模块:声誉模块、时间和地点接近度估计模块和多数模块。车辆可以根据具体情况单独或联合使用这些模块。由于该方案容易出错,我们在[2]中使用推理系统进行了形式化验证,以证明这三个模块及其组合的合理性和完备性。在本文中,我们通过处理两个两个的三个基本模块的连接来完成[1]的形式化验证。为此,我们首先完成了[2]中的推理系统,使三个模块的连接两个两个地结合在一起。在第二步中,提出了使用该整体推理系统的形式化验证来证明这些连接的健全性和完备性。这次验证的结果证实了所述连接的有效性,是健全和完整的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fighting organized crime by automatically detecting money laundering-related financial transactions Template Protected Authentication based on Location History and b-Bit MinHash Structuring a Cybersecurity Curriculum for Non-IT Employees of Micro- and Small Enterprises Privacy in Times of COVID-19: A Pilot Study in the Republic of Ireland Location Security under Reference Signals’ Spoofing Attacks: Threat Model and Bounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1