Beyond Usability and Performance: A Review of User Experience-focused Evaluations in Visualization

B. Saket, A. Endert, J. Stasko
{"title":"Beyond Usability and Performance: A Review of User Experience-focused Evaluations in Visualization","authors":"B. Saket, A. Endert, J. Stasko","doi":"10.1145/2993901.2993903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, studies of data visualization techniques and systems have evaluated visualizations with respect to usability goals such as effectiveness and efficiency. These studies assess performance-related metrics such as time and correctness of participants completing analytic tasks. Alternatively, several studies in InfoVis recently have evaluated visualizations by investigating user experience goals such as memorability, engagement, enjoyment and fun. These studies employ somewhat different evaluation methodologies to assess these other goals. The growing number of these studies, their alternative methodologies, and disagreements concerning their importance have motivated us to more carefully examine them. In this article, we review this growing collection of visualization evaluations that examine user experience goals and we discuss multiple issues regarding the studies including questions about their motivation and utility. Our aim is to provide a resource for future work that plans to evaluate visualizations using these goals.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2993901.2993903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

Traditionally, studies of data visualization techniques and systems have evaluated visualizations with respect to usability goals such as effectiveness and efficiency. These studies assess performance-related metrics such as time and correctness of participants completing analytic tasks. Alternatively, several studies in InfoVis recently have evaluated visualizations by investigating user experience goals such as memorability, engagement, enjoyment and fun. These studies employ somewhat different evaluation methodologies to assess these other goals. The growing number of these studies, their alternative methodologies, and disagreements concerning their importance have motivated us to more carefully examine them. In this article, we review this growing collection of visualization evaluations that examine user experience goals and we discuss multiple issues regarding the studies including questions about their motivation and utility. Our aim is to provide a resource for future work that plans to evaluate visualizations using these goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越可用性和性能:以用户体验为中心的可视化评估综述
传统上,数据可视化技术和系统的研究已经根据可用性目标(如有效性和效率)来评估可视化。这些研究评估与表现相关的指标,如参与者完成分析任务的时间和正确性。另外,InfoVis最近的一些研究通过调查用户体验目标(如可记忆性、参与度、享受和乐趣)来评估可视化。这些研究采用一些不同的评估方法来评估这些其他目标。这些研究的数量越来越多,它们的替代方法,以及对它们重要性的分歧,促使我们更仔细地研究它们。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了越来越多的用于检查用户体验目标的可视化评估,并讨论了有关这些研究的多个问题,包括它们的动机和效用问题。我们的目的是为未来的工作提供一个资源,计划使用这些目标来评估可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lowering the Barrier for Successful Replication and Evaluation A Nested Workflow Model for Visual Analytics Design and Validation Cognitive Stages in Visual Data Exploration Evaluating Information Visualization on Mobile Devices: Gaps and Challenges in the Empirical Evaluation Design Space Action Design Research and Visualization Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1