Remediation of soils contaminated with petrol and diesel using lime

C. Collins, D. Lothian, V. Schifano
{"title":"Remediation of soils contaminated with petrol and diesel using lime","authors":"C. Collins, D. Lothian, V. Schifano","doi":"10.2462/09670513.940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lime treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils offers the potential to stabilize and solidify these materials, with a consequent reduction in the risks associated with the leachate emanating from them. This can aid the disposal of contaminated soils or enable their on-site treatment. In this study, the addition of hydrated lime and quicklime significantly reduced the leaching of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) from soils polluted with a 50:50 petrol/diesel mixture. Treatment with quicklime was slightly more effective, but hydrated lime may be better in the field because of its ease of handling. It is proposed that this occurs as a consequence of pozzolanic reactions retaining the hydrocarbons within the soil matrix. There was some evidence that this may be a temporary effect, as leaching increased between seven and 21 days after treatment, but the TPH concentrations in the leachate of treated soils were still one order of magnitude below those of the control soil, offering significant protection to groundwater. The reduction in leaching following treatment was observed in both aliphatic and aromatic fractions, but the latter were more affected because of their higher solubilty. The results are discussed in the context of risk assessment, and recommendations for future research are made.","PeriodicalId":336428,"journal":{"name":"Land Contamination & Reclamation","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Contamination & Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2462/09670513.940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Lime treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils offers the potential to stabilize and solidify these materials, with a consequent reduction in the risks associated with the leachate emanating from them. This can aid the disposal of contaminated soils or enable their on-site treatment. In this study, the addition of hydrated lime and quicklime significantly reduced the leaching of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) from soils polluted with a 50:50 petrol/diesel mixture. Treatment with quicklime was slightly more effective, but hydrated lime may be better in the field because of its ease of handling. It is proposed that this occurs as a consequence of pozzolanic reactions retaining the hydrocarbons within the soil matrix. There was some evidence that this may be a temporary effect, as leaching increased between seven and 21 days after treatment, but the TPH concentrations in the leachate of treated soils were still one order of magnitude below those of the control soil, offering significant protection to groundwater. The reduction in leaching following treatment was observed in both aliphatic and aromatic fractions, but the latter were more affected because of their higher solubilty. The results are discussed in the context of risk assessment, and recommendations for future research are made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用石灰修复受汽油和柴油污染的土壤
对碳氢化合物污染的土壤进行石灰处理,有可能稳定和固化这些材料,从而降低与从中产生的渗滤液相关的风险。这可以帮助处置受污染的土壤或使其现场处理。在这项研究中,水合石灰和生石灰的加入显著降低了50:50汽油/柴油混合物污染土壤中总石油烃(TPH)的浸出。生石灰处理效果稍好,但水合石灰处理效果更好,因为它易于处理。有人提出,这是由于火山灰反应将碳氢化合物保留在土壤基质内的结果。有一些证据表明,这可能是暂时的影响,因为在处理后的7到21天内,浸出液中的TPH浓度仍然比对照土壤低一个数量级,对地下水提供了显著的保护。在处理后,脂肪族和芳香族馏分的浸出率均有所降低,但后者受影响更大,因为它们的溶解度更高。研究结果在风险评估的背景下进行了讨论,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surfactant-enhanced soil washing for the remediation of sites contaminated with pesticides. Cheby or not Cheby? Is that the question? Alternative integration procedures in combining multiple exposure routes for the derivation of generic assessment criteria with the CLEA model. Contaminated land risk assessment: variability in site assessment and decision making in the UK. New technologies for long-term protection of drinking-water resources from landfill emissions - investigation, containment and targeted material conversion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1