A. Aldridge, Eli Barnes, Cindy L. Bethel, Daniel W. Carruth, M. Koctúrová, Matus Pleva, J. Juhár
{"title":"Accessible Electroencephalograms (EEGs): A Comparative Review with OpenBCI’s Ultracortex Mark IV Headset","authors":"A. Aldridge, Eli Barnes, Cindy L. Bethel, Daniel W. Carruth, M. Koctúrová, Matus Pleva, J. Juhár","doi":"10.1109/RADIOELEK.2019.8733482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By evaluating the OpenBCI Ultracortex Mark IV EEG headset’s affordability, accessibility, and accuracy, it can be compared to other commercial- and medical-grade EEGs that have been evaluated previously. Nine participants used the Ultracortex Mark IV for the P300 Speller classification task, with the accuracy being measured along with the time required to set up the Mark IV, the participants’ comfort, and the participants’ perceived ease of setup. These results were then compared to previous evaluations of other EEG headsets. The OpenBCI Ultracortex Mark IV’s cost-effectiveness ratio is relatively low compared to the other EEG systems, and its ease of use and speed of set up are notably better than the other headsets being compared.","PeriodicalId":336454,"journal":{"name":"2019 29th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 29th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADIOELEK.2019.8733482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
By evaluating the OpenBCI Ultracortex Mark IV EEG headset’s affordability, accessibility, and accuracy, it can be compared to other commercial- and medical-grade EEGs that have been evaluated previously. Nine participants used the Ultracortex Mark IV for the P300 Speller classification task, with the accuracy being measured along with the time required to set up the Mark IV, the participants’ comfort, and the participants’ perceived ease of setup. These results were then compared to previous evaluations of other EEG headsets. The OpenBCI Ultracortex Mark IV’s cost-effectiveness ratio is relatively low compared to the other EEG systems, and its ease of use and speed of set up are notably better than the other headsets being compared.
通过评估OpenBCI ultrortex Mark IV脑电图耳机的可负担性、可及性和准确性,可以将其与之前评估过的其他商业和医疗级脑电图设备进行比较。9名参与者使用ultrortex Mark IV来完成P300拼写者分类任务,准确率与设置Mark IV所需的时间、参与者的舒适度以及参与者对设置的感知程度一起被测量。然后将这些结果与之前对其他脑电图耳机的评估进行比较。与其他脑电图系统相比,OpenBCI ultrortex Mark IV的成本效益比相对较低,其易用性和设置速度明显优于其他被比较的耳机。