Evaluation of Some Recent Debates on Scientific Progress

Funda Neslioğlu Serin
{"title":"Evaluation of Some Recent Debates on Scientific Progress","authors":"Funda Neslioğlu Serin","doi":"10.5840/kilikya2022918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At first glance, what scientific progress means seems to be a quickly answered question. It is not easy to think of the sciences without progress; sciences and the notion of progress seem identical in general. Describing the nature of scientific progress is an important task that will have practical and theoretical consequences. The approach, which argues that the background on which sciences are based does not have a historical or cultural character following the positivist interpretation, accepts sciences as testing the validity of observation and experiment data to a large extent. On the other hand, the tendency that emphasizes that the complex functioning of the history of science has an indelible mark on scientific theories prefers to build sciences on a historical and social basis. How both major approaches ground the idea of scientific progress profoundly affects both our understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge and the way we do science. This paper aims to evaluate scientific progress based on the views of prominent philosophers of science in the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":304114,"journal":{"name":"Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/kilikya2022918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At first glance, what scientific progress means seems to be a quickly answered question. It is not easy to think of the sciences without progress; sciences and the notion of progress seem identical in general. Describing the nature of scientific progress is an important task that will have practical and theoretical consequences. The approach, which argues that the background on which sciences are based does not have a historical or cultural character following the positivist interpretation, accepts sciences as testing the validity of observation and experiment data to a large extent. On the other hand, the tendency that emphasizes that the complex functioning of the history of science has an indelible mark on scientific theories prefers to build sciences on a historical and social basis. How both major approaches ground the idea of scientific progress profoundly affects both our understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge and the way we do science. This paper aims to evaluate scientific progress based on the views of prominent philosophers of science in the twentieth century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对最近关于科学进步的一些争论的评价
乍一看,科学进步意味着什么似乎是一个很快就能回答的问题。没有进步的科学是不容易想象的;科学和进步的概念大体上似乎是相同的。描述科学进步的本质是一项重要的任务,它将产生实际的和理论的后果。这种方法认为,按照实证主义的解释,科学所依据的背景不具有历史或文化特征,它在很大程度上接受科学是对观察和实验数据有效性的检验。另一方面,强调科学史的复杂功能对科学理论具有不可磨灭的影响的倾向倾向于在历史和社会基础上建立科学。这两种主要方法是如何为科学进步的概念奠定基础的,深刻地影响着我们对科学知识本质的理解和我们从事科学研究的方式。本文旨在根据20世纪著名科学哲学家的观点来评价科学进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aristoteles’te İyi Yaşam, Kendine Yeterlilik ve Kölelik David Hume’un Beğeni Standardı II Schrödinger’in Yaşam Nedir? Kitabı, Gen-Merkezcilik ve Biyolojik Organizasyon Farabi’nin Eğitim Felsefesi Bağlamında Din ve Felsefeyi Konumlandırışı İki Farklı Evren Tasarımı
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1