ANALISA PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN SECANT PILE DENGAN DIAPHRAGM WALL SEBAGAI PERBAIKAN PONDASI BENDUNGAN SEMANTOK

Adhelia Diah Pitaloka, Moch. Khamim, Dyah Lidyaningtias
{"title":"ANALISA PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN SECANT PILE DENGAN DIAPHRAGM WALL SEBAGAI PERBAIKAN PONDASI BENDUNGAN SEMANTOK","authors":"Adhelia Diah Pitaloka, Moch. Khamim, Dyah Lidyaningtias","doi":"10.55404/jos-mrk.2021.02.03.298-303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Package I Semantok Dam Contruction Project is a project belonging to the Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (BBWS) Brantas. In a dam to prevent seepage of water on the dam foundation, it is necessary to repair the foundation. The Semantok Dam uses the Secant Pile as a foundation repair. On the other side, there is another foundation dam repair, namely Diaphragm Wall which also has the same function as the Secant Pile. This Comparative Analysis of Secant Pile with Diaphragm Wall aims to compare the most efficient method with the required HSE, Time and Cost parameters. The data needed in the preparation of the Comparative Analysis are drawings of the Secant Pile and Diaphragm Wall work plans, technical specifications for foundation repair, and the unit price of the Nganjuk Regency work in 2021. The preparation of risk analysis in HSE uses HIRARC, the work schedule using Microsoft Project 2016 program and cost plan using Microsoft Excel 2019 program. The result of this comparative analysis is that Diaphragm Wall is more efficient in terms of implementation method, HSE, time, and also cost than Secant Pile. In the Secant Pile there are 43 accident risks, with a total processing time of 301 days, and the required cost is Rp. 198,009,706,092.05,. On the Diaphragm Wall there are 41 accident risks, with a total processing time of 74 days, and the required cost is Rp. 149,974,022,220.27,.","PeriodicalId":337938,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal JOS-MRK","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal JOS-MRK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55404/jos-mrk.2021.02.03.298-303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Package I Semantok Dam Contruction Project is a project belonging to the Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (BBWS) Brantas. In a dam to prevent seepage of water on the dam foundation, it is necessary to repair the foundation. The Semantok Dam uses the Secant Pile as a foundation repair. On the other side, there is another foundation dam repair, namely Diaphragm Wall which also has the same function as the Secant Pile. This Comparative Analysis of Secant Pile with Diaphragm Wall aims to compare the most efficient method with the required HSE, Time and Cost parameters. The data needed in the preparation of the Comparative Analysis are drawings of the Secant Pile and Diaphragm Wall work plans, technical specifications for foundation repair, and the unit price of the Nganjuk Regency work in 2021. The preparation of risk analysis in HSE uses HIRARC, the work schedule using Microsoft Project 2016 program and cost plan using Microsoft Excel 2019 program. The result of this comparative analysis is that Diaphragm Wall is more efficient in terms of implementation method, HSE, time, and also cost than Secant Pile. In the Secant Pile there are 43 accident risks, with a total processing time of 301 days, and the required cost is Rp. 198,009,706,092.05,. On the Diaphragm Wall there are 41 accident risks, with a total processing time of 74 days, and the required cost is Rp. 149,974,022,220.27,.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析将横向墙与横向墙的实施比较,以改善SEMANTOK大坝的基础
Semantok第一期大坝建设项目是Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (BBWS) Brantas的一个项目。在大坝中要防止坝基渗水,就必须对坝基进行修补。Semantok大坝使用Secant桩作为基础修复。另一侧是另一种基坝修复,即连续墙,它也具有与割线桩相同的功能。本次割桩与连续墙对比分析旨在比较最有效的方法与所需的HSE、时间和成本参数。编制对比分析时需要的资料是割线桩和连续墙施工图、基础修复技术规范、2021年汉江公社工程单价等。HSE风险分析的编制使用HIRARC,工作计划使用Microsoft Project 2016程序,成本计划使用Microsoft Excel 2019程序。对比分析的结果表明,连续墙在实施方式、HSE、时间和成本上均优于割线桩。Secant桩共43个事故风险,总处理时间301天,所需费用为Rp. 198,009,706,092.05,。连续墙有41个事故风险,总处理时间为74天,所需费用为Rp. 149,974,022,220.27,。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS STABILITAS TUBUH BENDUNGAN PADA BENDUNGAN SEMANTOK KABUPATEN NGANJUK PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR ANALISA PERPANJANGAN LANDASAN PACU PADA BANDAR UDARA ABDULRACHMAN SALEH MALANG (STA 2+250 – STA 3+000) EVALUASI DAN PERENCANAAN ULANG SISTEM JARINGAN DRAINASE KECAMATAN KARTOHARJO KOTA MADIUN ANALISA KERUSAKAN JALAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE BINA MARGA PADA JALAN RAYA JERU – JALAN RAYA TUMPANG KABUPATEN MALANG PERENCANAAN ULANG STRUKTUR ATAS DAN RAB GEDUNG KULIAH AKN PUTRA SANG FAJAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1