Gamifying piracy: functions and users of the Z-library

Zakayo Kjellström
{"title":"Gamifying piracy: functions and users of the Z-library","authors":"Zakayo Kjellström","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2021-0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to show how an illegal repository of literature, the Z-library, relates to and influences its users and how this relation is unique due to the illegal nature of the platform. The paper utilizes the idea of gamification to exemplify how to motivate users to contribute to a large shadow library in order to create the “world's largest e-book library,” sans “librarians.”Design/methodology/approachThe study makes use of an ethnographic approach. It interrogates the functions of the website through intensive use—a close reading of sorts. The data provide a foundation for illustrating how illegal text repositories function at a surface level and how their design appeals to their user-base.FindingsThe paper provides a thorough and non-biased overview of how a “black open access” or “shadow library” site provides its users with pirated literature. It suggests that the lynchpin sustaining their functionality is a gamification of piracy designed to motivate a fragmented collective of individuals who work primarily for personal reward, rather than altruistic goals.Research limitations/implicationsDue to the design of the study, the findings are not universal or applicable to all illegal repositories of text. Readers and researchers are encouraged to apply the concept introduced here to other cases.Social implicationsThis paper includes implication on the perception of literature piracy, how pirated literature is distributed and who performs the labor required to sustain illicit text repositories.Originality/valueThis paper provides a novel conceptual basis to study literature piracy.","PeriodicalId":402385,"journal":{"name":"J. Documentation","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-09-2021-0174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to show how an illegal repository of literature, the Z-library, relates to and influences its users and how this relation is unique due to the illegal nature of the platform. The paper utilizes the idea of gamification to exemplify how to motivate users to contribute to a large shadow library in order to create the “world's largest e-book library,” sans “librarians.”Design/methodology/approachThe study makes use of an ethnographic approach. It interrogates the functions of the website through intensive use—a close reading of sorts. The data provide a foundation for illustrating how illegal text repositories function at a surface level and how their design appeals to their user-base.FindingsThe paper provides a thorough and non-biased overview of how a “black open access” or “shadow library” site provides its users with pirated literature. It suggests that the lynchpin sustaining their functionality is a gamification of piracy designed to motivate a fragmented collective of individuals who work primarily for personal reward, rather than altruistic goals.Research limitations/implicationsDue to the design of the study, the findings are not universal or applicable to all illegal repositories of text. Readers and researchers are encouraged to apply the concept introduced here to other cases.Social implicationsThis paper includes implication on the perception of literature piracy, how pirated literature is distributed and who performs the labor required to sustain illicit text repositories.Originality/valueThis paper provides a novel conceptual basis to study literature piracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游戏化盗版:z库的功能和用户
本文旨在展示一个非法的文献库,即z库,是如何与它的用户产生关联和影响的,以及由于该平台的非法性质,这种关系是如何独特的。本文利用游戏化的思想举例说明了如何激励用户为一个大型影子图书馆做出贡献,以创建“世界上最大的电子书图书馆”,而不是“图书馆员”。设计/方法/方法这项研究采用了民族志方法。它通过密集的使用——某种形式的细读——来拷问网站的功能。这些数据为说明非法文本存储库在表面上如何工作以及它们的设计如何吸引其用户群提供了基础。这篇论文对“黑色开放获取”或“影子图书馆”网站如何向用户提供盗版文学进行了全面而公正的概述。这表明,维持其功能的关键是盗版的游戏化,旨在激励分散的个人群体,他们主要为个人奖励而工作,而不是利他目标。研究局限性/意义由于研究的设计,研究结果并不普遍或适用于所有非法文本存储库。我们鼓励读者和研究人员将这里介绍的概念应用于其他案例。社会意义本文包括对文学盗版的看法,盗版文学如何传播,以及谁承担维持非法文本库所需的劳动。本文为研究文学盗版提供了一个全新的概念基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The coverage of information science and knowledge organization in the Library of Congress Subject Headings A conceptual framework for motivation factors influencing researchers' use of academic web profiles Affective memories and perceived value: motivators and inhibitors of the data search-access process Perry Starlight, Ali Orbit and Kim Cosmos' alien encounter: creating a picturebook as information for children and parents participating in research Towards a vernacular aesthetics of liking for information studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1