Investigation of the Knoll Assessment Scale in a tertiary care facility.

Decubitus Pub Date : 1992-05-01
S Aronovitch, L Millenbach, G B Kelman, P Wing
{"title":"Investigation of the Knoll Assessment Scale in a tertiary care facility.","authors":"S Aronovitch,&nbsp;L Millenbach,&nbsp;G B Kelman,&nbsp;P Wing","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assist in assessing the validity and reliability of adaptation of the Knoll Tool, Assessment of Pressure Ulcer Potential. Data were retrospectively collected from charts of a random sample of patients (n = 62) who were admitted to a tertiary care facility. Total risk scores ranged from 0 to 22 with a mean of 8.7 and a standard deviation of 6.37. The alpha for the total assessment tool was .6352 with a standardized item alpha of .5973. Discriminant analysis predicted group membership at 62.9%. Group membership was most accurately predicted in Group 1 (76.9%). Discriminant analysis using a score of 11 predicted only 46.8% of group membership, although Group 1 predicted 88.5% and Group 4 predicted 85.7%. Low predictions may be related to small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":77095,"journal":{"name":"Decubitus","volume":"5 3","pages":"70-2, 74-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decubitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assist in assessing the validity and reliability of adaptation of the Knoll Tool, Assessment of Pressure Ulcer Potential. Data were retrospectively collected from charts of a random sample of patients (n = 62) who were admitted to a tertiary care facility. Total risk scores ranged from 0 to 22 with a mean of 8.7 and a standard deviation of 6.37. The alpha for the total assessment tool was .6352 with a standardized item alpha of .5973. Discriminant analysis predicted group membership at 62.9%. Group membership was most accurately predicted in Group 1 (76.9%). Discriminant analysis using a score of 11 predicted only 46.8% of group membership, although Group 1 predicted 88.5% and Group 4 predicted 85.7%. Low predictions may be related to small sample size.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某三级医疗机构的Knoll评估量表调查。
本研究的目的是协助评估Knoll工具对压疮电位评估的有效性和可靠性。数据是回顾性地从随机抽样的患者(n = 62)的图表中收集的,这些患者被送往三级医疗机构。总风险评分范围从0到22,平均值为8.7,标准差为6.37。总评估工具的alpha值为0.6352,标准化项目alpha值为0.5973。判别分析预测群体成员为62.9%。第1组对群体归属的预测最为准确(76.9%)。使用11分的判别分析只能预测46.8%的群体成员,尽管第1组预测88.5%,第4组预测85.7%。低预测可能与小样本量有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Much ado about nothing. The effects of prolonged pressure on skin blood flow in elderly patients at risk for pressure ulcers. Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements. Specialty support surfaces: a cost containment perspective. A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1