Ethics: What is the Research Scenario in the Brazilian Symposium WebMedia?

L. Carvalho, José Antonio Suzano, F. Santoro, Jonice Oliveira, Maria da Graça Pimentel
{"title":"Ethics: What is the Research Scenario in the Brazilian Symposium WebMedia?","authors":"L. Carvalho, José Antonio Suzano, F. Santoro, Jonice Oliveira, Maria da Graça Pimentel","doi":"10.1145/3539637.3557932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1995, a year after the W3C Consortium opening, the first edition of the Workshop on Multimedia and Hypermedia Systems, currently WebMedia, took place. Brasil took this tram when it was still leaving the station. However, thirty years after the Web foundation stone was laid by Tim Berners-Lee, he presents harsh criticism of its consequences, uses, and applications. Such as misinformation, mass manipulation, immoral use and abuse of personal data, corporate monopoly, and threats to democracy. He followed and kept up to date on the Web’s ethical aspects. Did WebMedia also follow and keep up? How does ethics explicitly permeate WebMedia research published between 2005 and 2021? Through the methodology of Systematic Literature Review and guided by the main question, we seek to present a quantitative and qualitative overview of this topic based on papers published in the most prominent Brazilian symposium dedicated to the Web and Multimedia. Considering the results, and unlike Berners-Lee, members of the WebMedia community put aside the ethical aspects, whether applied to the Web or Multimedia ethics or research ethics, mainly focusing on technical aspects. As an area with profound intersectional potential wastes potential. Nevertheless, there is still time to recover. We discuss this result, offering interpretations containing further questions, concerns, and future work.","PeriodicalId":350776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3539637.3557932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 1995, a year after the W3C Consortium opening, the first edition of the Workshop on Multimedia and Hypermedia Systems, currently WebMedia, took place. Brasil took this tram when it was still leaving the station. However, thirty years after the Web foundation stone was laid by Tim Berners-Lee, he presents harsh criticism of its consequences, uses, and applications. Such as misinformation, mass manipulation, immoral use and abuse of personal data, corporate monopoly, and threats to democracy. He followed and kept up to date on the Web’s ethical aspects. Did WebMedia also follow and keep up? How does ethics explicitly permeate WebMedia research published between 2005 and 2021? Through the methodology of Systematic Literature Review and guided by the main question, we seek to present a quantitative and qualitative overview of this topic based on papers published in the most prominent Brazilian symposium dedicated to the Web and Multimedia. Considering the results, and unlike Berners-Lee, members of the WebMedia community put aside the ethical aspects, whether applied to the Web or Multimedia ethics or research ethics, mainly focusing on technical aspects. As an area with profound intersectional potential wastes potential. Nevertheless, there is still time to recover. We discuss this result, offering interpretations containing further questions, concerns, and future work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦理:巴西网络媒体研讨会的研究场景是什么?
1995年,也就是W3C联盟成立一年后,多媒体和超媒体系统研讨会(即现在的WebMedia)的第一版召开了。巴西在有轨电车离开车站的时候乘坐了它。然而,在Tim Berners-Lee奠定Web基石的30年后,他对Web的后果、用途和应用程序提出了严厉的批评。比如虚假信息、大规模操纵、不道德地使用和滥用个人数据、企业垄断以及对民主的威胁。他一直关注网络伦理方面的问题,并保持与时俱进。WebMedia也跟随并跟上了吗?在2005年至2021年间发表的WebMedia研究中,伦理是如何明确渗透的?通过系统文献综述的方法,并以主要问题为指导,我们试图根据在巴西最著名的专门讨论网络和多媒体的研讨会上发表的论文,对这一主题进行定量和定性概述。考虑到结果,与Berners-Lee不同的是,WebMedia社区的成员将伦理方面放在一边,无论是应用于网络或多媒体伦理还是研究伦理,主要关注技术方面。废弃物作为一个具有深厚交叉潜力的领域。尽管如此,复苏仍有时间。我们讨论了这一结果,提供了包含进一步问题、关注和未来工作的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Topic Modeling Pre-processing Pipelines for Portuguese Texts A Proposal to Apply SignWriting in IMSC1 Standard for the Next-Generation of Brazilian DTV Broadcasting System Once Learning for Looking and Identifying Based on YOLO-v5 Object Detection I can’t pay! Accessibility analysis of mobile banking apps Should We Translate? Evaluating Toxicity in Online Comments when Translating from Portuguese to English
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1