Studying the effectiveness of android application permissions requests

Kevin Benton, L. Camp, Vaibhav Garg
{"title":"Studying the effectiveness of android application permissions requests","authors":"Kevin Benton, L. Camp, Vaibhav Garg","doi":"10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular platforms including Android and Facebook have adopted a permissions-based model. Under this model applications (apps) are required to declare specific access to user information required for functionality. We conducted two user studies on Amazon's Mechanical Turk to test the efficacy of these permissions requests on the Android platform. We found permissions were ineffective, even with the addition of an additional text warning. Conversely, we found that an app's download count had a strong effect on app installations. In order to determine if it was a failure of our text-based warning, we ran a second experiment with a previously proven visual indicator.","PeriodicalId":101502,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Popular platforms including Android and Facebook have adopted a permissions-based model. Under this model applications (apps) are required to declare specific access to user information required for functionality. We conducted two user studies on Amazon's Mechanical Turk to test the efficacy of these permissions requests on the Android platform. We found permissions were ineffective, even with the addition of an additional text warning. Conversely, we found that an app's download count had a strong effect on app installations. In order to determine if it was a failure of our text-based warning, we ran a second experiment with a previously proven visual indicator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究android应用程序权限请求的有效性
包括Android和Facebook在内的流行平台都采用了基于许可的模式。在这个模型下,应用程序需要声明对功能所需的用户信息的特定访问。我们对亚马逊的Mechanical Turk进行了两次用户研究,以测试这些权限请求在Android平台上的有效性。我们发现权限是无效的,即使添加了额外的文本警告。相反,我们发现应用的下载次数对应用安装有很大影响。为了确定这是否是我们基于文本的警告的失败,我们使用先前证明的视觉指示器进行了第二次实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A reconfigurable distributed CEP middleware for diverse mobility scenarios TinyBox: Social, local, mobile content sharing PIggy-backed key exchange using online services (PIKE) Towards context-aware internet services with unselfish clients Recommendations-based location privacy control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1