The Supreme Court's Aboriginal Rights Cases & Canada's Resource Industries: Estimating the Economic Effects

I. Keay, Cherie Metcalf
{"title":"The Supreme Court's Aboriginal Rights Cases & Canada's Resource Industries: Estimating the Economic Effects","authors":"I. Keay, Cherie Metcalf","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2876942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contributes to empirical literature testing the importance of secure formal legal rights for efficient natural resource exploitation and the promotion of economic growth and development. We use an event study methodology to estimate the market response to a series of six landmark Supreme Court of Canada decisions that reinterpreted aboriginal rights in Canada, providing a shock to the stability and security of the existing entitlements of Canadian resource firms. The paper expands on our earlier study of Canada’s Forest industry to test claims that recognition of aboriginal rights has created uncertainty imposing significant economic costs on Canada’s resource industries. We construct a new data set containing all firms listed on the TSX operating in the Forestry, Mining, and Energy sectors. Using this data set of 2,410 firm-events and corresponding firm level micro-data we provide evidence of the market response to the decisions for the resource sector globally, by industry and across firm characteristics. Our results show that the decisions generated statistically and economically significant effects, and generally support the importance of secure legal rights to the economic performance of resource industries. However, the effects vary in size and direction across decisions, industries, and firm-types.","PeriodicalId":436211,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Natural Resource Economics (Topic)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Natural Resource Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2876942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper contributes to empirical literature testing the importance of secure formal legal rights for efficient natural resource exploitation and the promotion of economic growth and development. We use an event study methodology to estimate the market response to a series of six landmark Supreme Court of Canada decisions that reinterpreted aboriginal rights in Canada, providing a shock to the stability and security of the existing entitlements of Canadian resource firms. The paper expands on our earlier study of Canada’s Forest industry to test claims that recognition of aboriginal rights has created uncertainty imposing significant economic costs on Canada’s resource industries. We construct a new data set containing all firms listed on the TSX operating in the Forestry, Mining, and Energy sectors. Using this data set of 2,410 firm-events and corresponding firm level micro-data we provide evidence of the market response to the decisions for the resource sector globally, by industry and across firm characteristics. Our results show that the decisions generated statistically and economically significant effects, and generally support the importance of secure legal rights to the economic performance of resource industries. However, the effects vary in size and direction across decisions, industries, and firm-types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最高法院原住民权利案与加拿大资源产业:经济影响评估
本文通过实证文献检验了安全的正式法律权利对于有效开发自然资源和促进经济增长和发展的重要性。我们使用事件研究方法来估计市场对加拿大最高法院一系列六个具有里程碑意义的决定的反应,这些决定重新解释了加拿大的土著权利,对加拿大资源公司现有权利的稳定性和安全性造成了冲击。本文扩展了我们之前对加拿大森林工业的研究,以检验承认土著权利造成了不确定性,给加拿大资源工业带来了巨大的经济成本的说法。我们构建了一个新的数据集,其中包含在多伦多证券交易所上市的所有在林业、矿业和能源部门经营的公司。利用这个2410个公司事件的数据集和相应的公司层面的微观数据,我们提供了市场对全球资源部门决策的反应的证据,按行业和跨公司特征。我们的研究结果表明,这些决策产生了统计上和经济上显著的影响,并且总体上支持了确保合法权利对资源行业经济绩效的重要性。然而,在不同的决策、行业和公司类型中,影响的大小和方向各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Natural Resources, Institutions and the Quality-adjusted Human Capital How Many km2 of Solar Panels in Spain and how much battery backup would it take to power Germany On the Long-Term Coupling and Short-Term Decoupling of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices Structural Behavioral Models for Rights-Based Fisheries Stranded Fossil Fuel Reserves and Firm Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1