Assessing the Competencies of the Medical Faculty Graduates within the frame of Pre-Graduate Medical Education National Core Curriculum

Fatih Namal
{"title":"Assessing the Competencies of the Medical Faculty Graduates within the frame of Pre-Graduate Medical Education National Core Curriculum","authors":"Fatih Namal","doi":"10.54584/lms.2022.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this descriptive study, it is aimed to determine the competencies of physicians according to NCC-2014, to create databases for current educational output, to consider graduate competencies while preparing medical faculty training curriculum and to make suggestions for education. For this purpose, a total of 501 physicians agreed to answer the questionnaire and working in designated military hospitals and military primary care examination centers and residents at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Hospital were included in the study. The data were collected by the researcher by face-to-face interviews with the participants between 10 March 2016 and 30 June 2016. The scores of the physicians regarding the basic medical practices were collected under six main topics and compared with the minimum levels described in NCC-2014. As a result of the study, 161 (32.1%) participants were adequate in “history taking” applications, 78 (15.6%) participants were adequate in “recording, reporting and notification”, 72 (14.4%) participants were competent in “preventive medicine and community medicine practice”, 62 (12.4%) participants were competent in “interventional and noninterventional practice”, 26 (5.2%) participants were competent in “laboratory tests and other related procedures”, and 25 (5.0%) participants were competent in “general and problem focused physical examinations”. It has been determined that physicians do not receive adequate training in the medical faculty, especially in the field of forensic medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. Curriculum programs should be prepared that will include measures for the development of all application areas, especially the practices determined under the heading of “general and problem focused physical examinations” and “laboratory tests and other related procedures”, where the participants have the lowest proficiency.","PeriodicalId":344016,"journal":{"name":"Life and Medical Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54584/lms.2022.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this descriptive study, it is aimed to determine the competencies of physicians according to NCC-2014, to create databases for current educational output, to consider graduate competencies while preparing medical faculty training curriculum and to make suggestions for education. For this purpose, a total of 501 physicians agreed to answer the questionnaire and working in designated military hospitals and military primary care examination centers and residents at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Hospital were included in the study. The data were collected by the researcher by face-to-face interviews with the participants between 10 March 2016 and 30 June 2016. The scores of the physicians regarding the basic medical practices were collected under six main topics and compared with the minimum levels described in NCC-2014. As a result of the study, 161 (32.1%) participants were adequate in “history taking” applications, 78 (15.6%) participants were adequate in “recording, reporting and notification”, 72 (14.4%) participants were competent in “preventive medicine and community medicine practice”, 62 (12.4%) participants were competent in “interventional and noninterventional practice”, 26 (5.2%) participants were competent in “laboratory tests and other related procedures”, and 25 (5.0%) participants were competent in “general and problem focused physical examinations”. It has been determined that physicians do not receive adequate training in the medical faculty, especially in the field of forensic medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. Curriculum programs should be prepared that will include measures for the development of all application areas, especially the practices determined under the heading of “general and problem focused physical examinations” and “laboratory tests and other related procedures”, where the participants have the lowest proficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在研究生预科医学教育国家核心课程框架下对医学院毕业生能力的评估
在这项描述性研究中,目的是根据NCC-2014确定医生的能力,为当前的教育产出创建数据库,在准备医学院培训课程时考虑研究生的能力,并为教育提出建议。为此目的,共有501名同意回答调查问卷的医生和在指定的军事医院和军事初级保健检查中心工作的医生以及安卡拉大学医学院医院的住院医生被纳入研究。数据由研究人员在2016年3月10日至2016年6月30日期间通过与参与者的面对面访谈收集。在六个主要主题下收集医生的基本医疗实践得分,并与NCC-2014中描述的最低水平进行比较。研究结果显示,161名(32.1%)参与者在“病史记录”申请方面合格,78名(15.6%)参与者在“记录、报告和通知”方面合格,72名(14.4%)参与者在“预防医学和社区医学实践”方面合格,62名(12.4%)参与者在“介入性和非介入性实践”方面合格,26名(5.2%)参与者在“实验室测试和其他相关程序”方面合格。25名(5.0%)参与者在“一般和问题集中体检”中表现良好。已经确定,医生没有在医学院接受适当的培训,特别是在法医和妇产科领域。编制的课程方案应包括发展所有应用领域的措施,特别是在"一般和侧重问题的体格检查"和"实验室测试及其他相关程序"标题下确定的做法,因为参与者的熟练程度最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Serum Zinc Level in Patients Followed in Hospital with the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Samsun Province, Türkiye Choosing Wisely in Immunology Laboratory: Reviewing of Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Test Requests and Results Together with Other Tests Incidence and Imaging of Colorectal Cancer Between 2015-2020 in Somalia: A Review of 585 Colonoscopy A 6-Year Review of the Electronic Drug Prescription System in the Republic of Türkiye Utilization Rate of Primary Health Services in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients Diagnosed with Rheumatic Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1