Bioethics, Complementarity, and Corporate Criminal Liability

R. Long
{"title":"Bioethics, Complementarity, and Corporate Criminal Liability","authors":"R. Long","doi":"10.1163/15718123-01703004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a brief introduction to some contemporary challenges found in the intersection of bioethics and international criminal law involving genetic privacy, organ trafficking, genetic engineering, and cloning. These challenges push us to re-evaluate the question of whether the international criminal law should hold corporations criminally liable. I argue that a minimalist and Strawsonian conception of corporate responsibility could be useful for deterring the wrongs outlined in first few sections and in answering compelling objections to corporate criminal liability.","PeriodicalId":431200,"journal":{"name":"Biolaw and International Criminal Law","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biolaw and International Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01703004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article provides a brief introduction to some contemporary challenges found in the intersection of bioethics and international criminal law involving genetic privacy, organ trafficking, genetic engineering, and cloning. These challenges push us to re-evaluate the question of whether the international criminal law should hold corporations criminally liable. I argue that a minimalist and Strawsonian conception of corporate responsibility could be useful for deterring the wrongs outlined in first few sections and in answering compelling objections to corporate criminal liability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物伦理学、互补性和企业刑事责任
本文简要介绍了生物伦理学与国际刑法交叉领域的一些当代挑战,涉及基因隐私、器官贩运、基因工程和克隆。这些挑战促使我们重新评估国际刑法是否应追究公司刑事责任的问题。我认为,一个极简主义和斯特劳主义的企业责任概念可能有助于阻止前几节中概述的错误,并回答对企业刑事责任的令人信服的反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of Bioethics and International Criminal Law in the Light of Philosophy of Islamic Jurisprudence Medical Evidence at the International Criminal Court – Dosage and Contraindications Aspirational Justice: Achieving Equity for Children Using the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Criminal Court’s Policy on Children Introduction: The Emergence of International Criminal Biolaw From the Martens Clause to Consent to Human Experimentations, the Legal Journey of the Judges during the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1