In Defense of Moral Rights:

B. Mori
{"title":"In Defense of Moral Rights:","authors":"B. Mori","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv143mdgf.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I would like to defend, against its critics, the possibility of a rights-based normative theory of ethics, starting from the view that to answer today’s moral questions we cannot avoid to confront with the question of what rights and, peculiarly, what moral rights should be granted to people, where for ‘moral rights’, I mean ‘rights which are not the product of community legislation or social practice, which persist even in the face of contrary legislation or practice and which prescribe the boundary beyond which neither individuals nor the community may go in pursuit of their overall ends’ (1).","PeriodicalId":252644,"journal":{"name":"Freedom and Fulfillment","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freedom and Fulfillment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv143mdgf.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper I would like to defend, against its critics, the possibility of a rights-based normative theory of ethics, starting from the view that to answer today’s moral questions we cannot avoid to confront with the question of what rights and, peculiarly, what moral rights should be granted to people, where for ‘moral rights’, I mean ‘rights which are not the product of community legislation or social practice, which persist even in the face of contrary legislation or practice and which prescribe the boundary beyond which neither individuals nor the community may go in pursuit of their overall ends’ (1).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捍卫精神权利:
在本文中,我想为其批评者辩护,一种基于权利的道德规范理论的可能性,从这样一个观点出发,即为了回答今天的道德问题,我们无法避免面对应该赋予人们什么样的权利,特别是什么样的道德权利的问题,这里的“道德权利”,我指的是“不是社区立法或社会实践产物的权利”,即使面对相反的立法或实践,它们仍然坚持,并且规定了个人和社会在追求其总体目标时都不能超越的界限”(1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back Matter Seven Modes of Reasoning That Can Justify Overlooking the Merits of the Individual Case—When the Facts Are Right (1991) The Child’s Right to an Open Future (1980) An Unpromising Approach to the “Right to Die” (1991) Civil Disobedience in the Modern World (1979)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1