Comparative Analysis of Six Programming Languages Based on Readability, Writability, and Reliability

Zahin Ahmed, Farishta Jayas Kinjol, I. Ananya
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Six Programming Languages Based on Readability, Writability, and Reliability","authors":"Zahin Ahmed, Farishta Jayas Kinjol, I. Ananya","doi":"10.1109/ICCIT54785.2021.9689813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the development of programming languages has been centered around making them easily understandable and learnable to users. Hence, the readability, writability of languages is being constantly improved while trying to keep the performance reliable. These factors affect how many new users start to use a particular language and how many experienced programmers continue to use it reliably in real applications. Hence, this research has compared the readability, writability, and reliability of six mainstream programming languages, namely C, C++, Java, JavaScript, Python, and R, based on their theoretical characteristics. Furthermore, we conducted a survey determining the choice of a language among programmers and nonprogrammers, which complemented the results gathered from the study. We found that Python outperforms others in terms of its readability and writability, while Java is proven to be the most reliable of all. We reported our findings, insights, and a discussion on the future development of better evaluation metrics.","PeriodicalId":166450,"journal":{"name":"2021 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT54785.2021.9689813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the development of programming languages has been centered around making them easily understandable and learnable to users. Hence, the readability, writability of languages is being constantly improved while trying to keep the performance reliable. These factors affect how many new users start to use a particular language and how many experienced programmers continue to use it reliably in real applications. Hence, this research has compared the readability, writability, and reliability of six mainstream programming languages, namely C, C++, Java, JavaScript, Python, and R, based on their theoretical characteristics. Furthermore, we conducted a survey determining the choice of a language among programmers and nonprogrammers, which complemented the results gathered from the study. We found that Python outperforms others in terms of its readability and writability, while Java is proven to be the most reliable of all. We reported our findings, insights, and a discussion on the future development of better evaluation metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于可读性、可写性和可靠性的六种编程语言的比较分析
近年来,编程语言的发展一直围绕着使它们易于用户理解和学习。因此,在保持性能可靠的同时,语言的可读性和可写性也在不断提高。这些因素会影响有多少新用户开始使用特定语言,以及有多少有经验的程序员继续在实际应用程序中可靠地使用它。因此,本研究根据C、c++、Java、JavaScript、Python和R这六种主流编程语言的理论特点,对它们的可读性、可写性和可靠性进行了比较。此外,我们进行了一项调查,以确定程序员和非程序员之间对语言的选择,这补充了从研究中收集到的结果。我们发现Python在可读性和可写性方面优于其他语言,而Java被证明是最可靠的。我们报告了我们的发现、见解,并讨论了更好的评估指标的未来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Eigenvalue Distribution of Hankel Matrix: A Tool for Spectral Estimation From Noisy Data Demystify the Black-box of Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Detection from Chest CT Radiographs Machine Learning Techniques to Precaution of Emerging Disease in the Poultry Industry A Framework for Multi-party Skyline Query Maintaining Privacy and Data Integrity Application of Feature based Face Detection in Adaptive Skin Pixel Identification Using Signal Processing Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1