Toward A Theocentric Ecological Ethic of Inclusive Well-being

Jun, Hyun-Shik
{"title":"Toward A Theocentric Ecological Ethic of Inclusive Well-being","authors":"Jun, Hyun-Shik","doi":"10.26590/MADANG..20.201312.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grappling with the ecological crisis as a crisis of culture and also an opportunity for emancipation, this paper attempts to suggest a theocentric ecological ethic of inclusive well-being as one of Christian environmental ethics in consideration of a methodology of hermeneutical reconstruction with reflective equilibrium. Firstly, it reviews paradigm change in environmental ethics and then confirms the contextual and provisional nature of ethical practice and theories. Secondly, this paper explores a hermeneutical reconstruction of five major moral grounds or theories for ecological ethics with reflective equilibrium and then affirms that no single ground or theory should be foundational. Rather the foundation lies in critical correlation between ethical practice and theories. Thirdly, it suggests a theocentric ecological ethic of inclusive well-being, which is its moral criterion by which moral judgments and theological sin are measured. In recognition of its inevitable moral ambiguity in the competing realities of life, its moral principle of inclusive well-being provides us with practical awareness that we might be drawing a narrower line of well-being than is necessary in specific contexts. Then, it challenges us to draw a more inclusive range of well-being for the sake of the good of creation and God more so than conventional anthropocentric or biocentric environmental ethics.","PeriodicalId":130336,"journal":{"name":"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26590/MADANG..20.201312.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Grappling with the ecological crisis as a crisis of culture and also an opportunity for emancipation, this paper attempts to suggest a theocentric ecological ethic of inclusive well-being as one of Christian environmental ethics in consideration of a methodology of hermeneutical reconstruction with reflective equilibrium. Firstly, it reviews paradigm change in environmental ethics and then confirms the contextual and provisional nature of ethical practice and theories. Secondly, this paper explores a hermeneutical reconstruction of five major moral grounds or theories for ecological ethics with reflective equilibrium and then affirms that no single ground or theory should be foundational. Rather the foundation lies in critical correlation between ethical practice and theories. Thirdly, it suggests a theocentric ecological ethic of inclusive well-being, which is its moral criterion by which moral judgments and theological sin are measured. In recognition of its inevitable moral ambiguity in the competing realities of life, its moral principle of inclusive well-being provides us with practical awareness that we might be drawing a narrower line of well-being than is necessary in specific contexts. Then, it challenges us to draw a more inclusive range of well-being for the sake of the good of creation and God more so than conventional anthropocentric or biocentric environmental ethics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向以神为中心的包容性福祉生态伦理
生态危机既是一种文化危机,也是一种解放的机会,本文试图通过反思平衡的解释学重建方法,提出一种以神为中心的包容性福祉生态伦理作为基督教环境伦理之一。首先回顾了环境伦理学的范式变迁,然后确认了伦理实践和理论的语境性和临时性。其次,本文以反思平衡的方式对生态伦理的五大道德基础或理论进行了解释学重构,并确定不应以单一的基础或理论为基础。相反,其基础在于伦理实践与理论之间的批判性关联。第三,它提出了一种以神为中心的包容性福祉生态伦理,这是衡量道德判断和神学罪的道德标准。由于认识到在竞争的生活现实中不可避免地存在道德歧义,其包容性幸福的道德原则为我们提供了实际的意识,即我们可能会在特定背景下绘制更窄的幸福线。然后,它挑战我们为创造和上帝的利益绘制一个更包容的福祉范围,而不是传统的人类中心主义或生物中心主义环境伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communism and Capitalism, and Conservatism and Consumerism: Some Contexts and Contents of Korean Protestantism A pursuit of concept of “sin/guilt” in history – on a revolutionary theology of Israel Marginalized Korean Female sex worker in the context of Korean Minjung and Feminist Theology Post Human Feminists’ View on ‘Women and Nature’ in comparison with Ecstatic Naturalism Death and Immortality: Biological and East Asian Religious Reflections on Transhumanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1