{"title":"MISDEMEANOR: NEW CHALLENGES OF DEFINITION INTERPRETATION","authors":"Ivan Krasnytskyi, G. Yaremko","doi":"10.32518/2617-4162-2020-4-49-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to the issue of misdemeanor term content and the scope determination, and its differentiation from a crime. This issue arises from the use in the Criminal Code of Ukraine of the regulatory construction �the other punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� when defining the term of a misdemeanor. Such legislative definition can have double interpretation: either as other, more lenient than liberty deprivation for a particular period, types of punishment or as other types of punishment, but for those, that according to their content, also mean liberty deprivation (isolation from society) � imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Purpose. The purpose of this article is not to question language or technical and legislative means used for the formulation of the misdemeanor definition, but a significant law-application issue the solution of which will directly affect criminal-material and procedural consequences connected with reference of a criminal offense to the category of a misdemeanor or minor offense. Results. This article gives reasons why the regulatory construction �crimes not related to the liberty deprivation� should be interpreted as other types of punishment but for imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Another approach, which is to interpret the corresponding regulatory provision as any type of punishment different to liberty deprivation for a particular period or life sentence, is rather a forced one, but not well-grounded. Conclusion. There are enough of scientific and regulatory grounds for understanding of the used in part 2 article 12 of the CC of Ukraine definition �punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� as the corresponding list of punishment types listed in part 1 article 51 of the CC of Ukraine, but for the punishment in the way of imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Arguing that the corresponding definition should be interpreted as any type of punishment other than liberty deprivation for a particular period and life sentence is rather a forced position but not well-grounded.","PeriodicalId":344341,"journal":{"name":"Social Legal Studios","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2020-4-49-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article is dedicated to the issue of misdemeanor term content and the scope determination, and its differentiation from a crime. This issue arises from the use in the Criminal Code of Ukraine of the regulatory construction �the other punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� when defining the term of a misdemeanor. Such legislative definition can have double interpretation: either as other, more lenient than liberty deprivation for a particular period, types of punishment or as other types of punishment, but for those, that according to their content, also mean liberty deprivation (isolation from society) � imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Purpose. The purpose of this article is not to question language or technical and legislative means used for the formulation of the misdemeanor definition, but a significant law-application issue the solution of which will directly affect criminal-material and procedural consequences connected with reference of a criminal offense to the category of a misdemeanor or minor offense. Results. This article gives reasons why the regulatory construction �crimes not related to the liberty deprivation� should be interpreted as other types of punishment but for imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Another approach, which is to interpret the corresponding regulatory provision as any type of punishment different to liberty deprivation for a particular period or life sentence, is rather a forced one, but not well-grounded. Conclusion. There are enough of scientific and regulatory grounds for understanding of the used in part 2 article 12 of the CC of Ukraine definition �punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� as the corresponding list of punishment types listed in part 1 article 51 of the CC of Ukraine, but for the punishment in the way of imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Arguing that the corresponding definition should be interpreted as any type of punishment other than liberty deprivation for a particular period and life sentence is rather a forced position but not well-grounded.